Paper · 2022 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

To study the effect of foliar spray of urea and NAA on the recovery percentage and yield of dry zinger (Zingiber officinale roscoe)

Rajendra Prasad

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Study was conducted department of Horticulture at Kulbhaskar Ashram P.G. College, Allahabad during 2016-17. To study the effect of foliar spray of Urea and NAA on the recovery percentage and yield of dry ginger recovery was calculated variety Baruwa Sagar (21.95, 21.73 and 21.87 per cent recovery of dry ginger) was superior to Rio-de-Janeiro (21.42, 20.78 and 21.17 %) in first year second year and in pooled analysis. in case of urea concentration, the U1 was superior to U0 in both the year and in pooled mean. In respect of NAA on the concentration was increased from lower to higher i.e., No, N1 and N2 the recovery of dry ginger per cent was also found to increase in ascending orders. The value were 21.15, 21.64 and 22.27, 20.78, 21.38 and 21.90 and 20.96, 21.47 and 22.09 per cent in the first second year and in pooled mean, respectively. The yield of dry ginger in the important character to Judge the effect of urea and NAA on the varieties under observation. Production of dry ginger was more in variety Baruwa Sagar to the extent of 62.92, 61.73 and 62.32 q/ha in comparison to variety Rio-de-Jeneiro which gave 61.08, 59.50 and 60.29 q/ha in first and second year and in pooled mean. It also found that the production of dry ginger was maximum when NAA 400 PPM was applied (64.27 and 26.81) was quality good to NAA 200 PPM (63.63 and 62.20) and minimum in No (58.09 and 56.81) in the first and second year. The interaction of urea with NAA showed that the production of dry ginger was maximum in U1 N2 followed by U1, N1 and minimum in Uo No showing values as 65.24 and 63.74, 64.34 and 62.54 and 54.39 and 53.28 q/ha, respectively in first and second year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar had higher dry ginger recovery than Rio-de-Janeiro in both years and pooled analysis.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
recovery of dry gingere0
Direction
superiore0
Value
21.95, 21.73 and 21.87 per cente0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janeiroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety Baruwa Sagar (21.95, 21.73 and 21.87 per cent recovery of dry ginger) was superior to Rio-de-Janeiro (21.42, 20.78 and 21.17 %) in first year second year and in pooled analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

U1 exceeded U0 for dry ginger recovery in both years and the pooled mean.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
U1e0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
U0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of urea concentration, the U1 was superior to U0 in both the year and in pooled mean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry ginger recovery rose with increasing NAA concentration.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
recovery of dry ginger per cente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA on the concentration was increased from lower to higher i.e., No, N1 and N2 the recovery of dry ginger per cent was also found to increase in ascending orders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar produced more dry ginger than Rio-de-Jeneiro across both years and pooled analysis.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
Production of dry gingere0
Direction
moree0
Value
62.92, 61.73 and 62.32 q/hae0
Comparator
Rio-de-Jeneiroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Production of dry ginger was more in variety Baruwa Sagar to the extent of 62.92, 61.73 and 62.32 q/ha in comparison to variety Rio-de-Jeneiro which gave 61.08, 59.50 and 60.29 q/ha in first and second year and in pooled mean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 400 PPM gave maximum dry ginger production in the two years.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe0
Outcome
production of dry gingere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
64.27 and 26.81e0
Comparator
NAA 200 PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production of dry ginger was maximum when NAA 400 PPM was applied (64.27 and 26.81) was quality good to NAA 200 PPM (63.63 and 62.20) and minimum in No (58.09 and 56.81) in the first and second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No NAA gave minimum dry ginger production in the two years.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
Noe0
Outcome
production of dry gingere1
Direction
minimume0
Value
58.09 and 56.81e0
Comparator
NAA 400 PPMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum in No (58.09 and 56.81) in the first and second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of dry ginger was maximum when NAA 400 PPM was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The U1 N2 combination gave maximum dry ginger production.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
U1 N2e0
Outcome
production of dry gingere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.24 and 63.74e0
Comparator
Uo Noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production of dry ginger was maximum in U1 N2 followed by U1, N1 and minimum in Uo No showing values as 65.24 and 63.74, 64.34 and 62.54 and 54.39 and 53.28 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Uo No combination gave minimum dry ginger production.

Taxon
Zingiber officinale roscoeZingiber officinalet0
Treatment
Uo Noe0
Outcome
production of dry gingere0
Direction
minimume0
Value
54.39 and 53.28 q/hae0
Comparator
U1 N2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production of dry ginger was maximum in U1 N2 followed by U1, N1 and minimum in Uo No showing values as 65.24 and 63.74, 64.34 and 62.54 and 54.39 and 53.28 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zingiber officinale roscoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.