Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Effect of foliar spray of urea and NAA on the growth and yield of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe)

Rajendra Prasad

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted at Department of Horticulture Kulbhaskar Ashram P.G. College, Allahabad during 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of foliar spray of urea and NAA on the growth and yield of ginger. Healthy and disease free ginger rhizomes were select and used for planting. The rhizomes were then, cut into small pieces of about 15 gm. weights and planted at spacing of 25x20 cm. The experimental was conducted in Factorial Randomized block design with Twelve treatments replication thrice. 180 days after sowing that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar, 57.54 and 58.09 cm) maximum height than the variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro, 56.17 and 56.34 cm.) in both the years that the data also showed that the application of urea as foliar spray increase the plant height. Significantly both years. In respect of doses of NAA, 400 PPM was (N2) height of 59.69 and 59.81 cm. both the years and next dose of 200 PPM (N1) maximum height 57.11 and 57.84 cm. as compared to 53.75 and 54.01 cm. in N0 in both year. Thickness of main stem at 180 days that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar, 0.895, 0.896 and 0.895 cm.) was superior to variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro, 0.881, 0.864 and 0.872 cm.) in respect of thickness in first year, second year and in pooled mean. It was also found application of urea in both the years and pooled analysis. It was further observed that there was maximum thickness in N2 (NAA 400 PPM, 0911 cm) which was at Par with N1 (NAA 200 PPM, 0.901 cm.) and minimum in No (NAA OPPM, 0.852 cm.) in the first year however, in the second year. Number of tillers at 180 days that the variety V1 Baruwa Sagar as 13.62, 13.18 and 13.40 was superior than variety V2 Rio-de-Janerio recording 13.17, 12.93 and 13.04 Number per plant in the first and second year and in pooled analysis, respectively. it was also found application of Urea in both the years. The data furthe showed that treatment N2 (NAA 400 PPM) produced maximum number of tillers an 13.78 per plant, which was as good as to N1 (NAA 200 PPM) recording 13.40 number of tillers per plant in the first year. However, in the second year N2 was significantly superior by showing 13.82 number of tillers as compared to 13.40 and 11.95 per plant in N1 and N0, respectively. Yield per Plant of ginger that the variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar) was significantly superior to variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro) in both the years and in pooled analysis. The data showed that there was maximum plant yield with the application of N2 (NAA 400 PPM) followed by N1 (NAA 200 PPM) and minimum in N0 (NAA O PPM) in both the years as well as in pooled mean. The maximum value was 151.97 gm. in the first year in N2, 149.67 gm. in the second year and 150.82 gm per plant in the pooled mean. Similarly, the application of Urea 2 per cent also produced the higher yield to the tune of 150.68, 148.20 and 149.44 gm. per plant respectively in the first year, second year and in pooled mean. Yield per hectare that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar) sagar significantly superior to variety variety V2 (Rio-de-Janerio) in both the years as well as pooled mean. That yield values were 286.02, 277.32, 281.66 q/ha in first year second year and pooled mean, respectively. The application of urea also showed significantly increase in yield in both the years as well as in pooled mean. Similarly, the N2 (NAA 400 PPM) gave the maximum followed by N1¬ (NAA 200 PPM) and N0 (NAA O PPM) to the tune of 301.39, 299.03 and 300.21, 287.36, 284.03 and 265.69 and 235.56, 244.03 and 258.42 q/ha in first year second year and pooled mean respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar ginger was taller than Rio-de-Janeiro at 180 days in both years, reaching 57.54 and 58.09 cm.

Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
57.54 and 58.09 cme0
Qualifier
180 days after sowinge0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janeiroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“180 days after sowing that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar, 57.54 and 58.09 cm) maximum height than the variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro, 56.17 and 56.34 cm.) in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea significantly increased ginger height in both years.

Treatment
urea as foliar spraye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of urea as foliar spray increase the plant height. Significantly both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 400 PPM produced heights of 59.69 and 59.81 cm, above untreated values.

Treatment
400 PPMe0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
59.69 and 59.81 cme0
Qualifier
NAAe0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of doses of NAA, 400 PPM was (N2) height of 59.69 and 59.81 cm. both the years and next dose of 200 PPM (N1) maximum height 57.11 and 57.84 cm. as compared to 53.75 and 54.01 cm. in N0 in both year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 200 PPM produced heights of 57.11 and 57.84 cm, above N0.

Treatment
200 PPMe0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
57.11 and 57.84 cme0
Qualifier
NAAe0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of doses of NAA, 400 PPM was (N2) height of 59.69 and 59.81 cm. both the years and next dose of 200 PPM (N1) maximum height 57.11 and 57.84 cm. as compared to 53.75 and 54.01 cm. in N0 in both year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar stem thickness exceeded Rio-de-Janeiro with 0.895, 0.896 and 0.895 cm across years and pooled mean.

Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
Thickness of main steme0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.895, 0.896 and 0.895 cme0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janeiroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thickness of main stem at 180 days that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar, 0.895, 0.896 and 0.895 cm.) was superior to variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro, 0.881, 0.864 and 0.872 cm.) in respect of thickness in first year, second year and in pooled mean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 400 PPM gave maximum first-year stem thickness of 0911 cm and was at par with 200 PPM.

Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe0
Outcome
thicknesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0911 cme0
Qualifier
at Pare0
Comparator
NAA 200 PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was maximum thickness in N2 (NAA 400 PPM, 0911 cm) which was at Par with N1 (NAA 200 PPM, 0.901 cm.) and minimum in No (NAA OPPM, 0.852 cm.) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 200 PPM stem thickness was 0.901 cm in the first year, above the minimum untreated thickness.

Treatment
NAA 200 PPMe0
Outcome
thicknesse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.901 cme0
Comparator
NAA OPPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was maximum thickness in N2 (NAA 400 PPM, 0911 cm) which was at Par with N1 (NAA 200 PPM, 0.901 cm.) and minimum in No (NAA OPPM, 0.852 cm.) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated ginger had minimum first-year stem thickness of 0.852 cm.

Treatment
NAA OPPMe0
Outcome
thicknesse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.852 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was maximum thickness in N2 (NAA 400 PPM, 0911 cm) which was at Par with N1 (NAA 200 PPM, 0.901 cm.) and minimum in No (NAA OPPM, 0.852 cm.) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar had more tillers than Rio-de-Janerio across both years and pooled analysis.

Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
Number of tillerse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
13.62, 13.18 and 13.40e0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janerioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of tillers at 180 days that the variety V1 Baruwa Sagar as 13.62, 13.18 and 13.40 was superior than variety V2 Rio-de-Janerio recording 13.17, 12.93 and 13.04 Number per plant in the first and second year and in pooled analysis, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 400 PPM gave maximum first-year tiller number of 13.78 per plant, comparable to 200 PPM.

Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.78 per plante0
Qualifier
as good ase0
Comparator
NAA 200 PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment N2 (NAA 400 PPM) produced maximum number of tillers an 13.78 per plant, which was as good as to N1 (NAA 200 PPM) recording 13.40 number of tillers per plant in the first year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–2056 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 200 PPM gave 13.40 tillers per plant in the first year.

Treatment
NAA 200 PPMe0
Outcome
number of tillers per plante0
Value
13.40e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N1 (NAA 200 PPM) recording 13.40 number of tillers per plant in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2055 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year NAA 400 PPM significantly exceeded N1 and N0 in tiller number, with 13.82 tillers.

Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe1
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
13.82e0
Comparator
N1 and N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second year N2 was significantly superior by showing 13.82 number of tillers as compared to 13.40 and 11.95 per plant in N1 and N0, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2217 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment N2 (NAA 400 PPM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1897 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year N1 and N0 tiller numbers were 13.40 and 11.95 per plant respectively.

Outcome
number of tillerse0
Value
13.40 and 11.95 per plante0
Qualifier
N1 and N0, respectivelye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second year N2 was significantly superior by showing 13.82 number of tillers as compared to 13.40 and 11.95 per plant in N1 and N0, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2217 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar had significantly greater yield per plant than Rio-de-Janeiro in both years and pooled analysis.

Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
Yield per Plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janeiroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield per Plant of ginger that the variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar) was significantly superior to variety V2 (Rio-de-Janeiro) in both the years and in pooled analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 400 PPM gave maximum yield per plant with 151.97 gm., 149.67 gm. and 150.82 gm per plant across years and pooled mean.

Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
151.97 gm. in the first year in N2, 149.67 gm. in the second year and 150.82 gm per plante0
Qualifier
minimum in N0 (NAA O PPM)e0
Comparator
NAA 200 PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was maximum plant yield with the application of N2 (NAA 400 PPM) followed by N1 (NAA 200 PPM) and minimum in N0 (NAA O PPM) in both the years as well as in pooled mean. The maximum value was 151.97 gm. in the first year in N2, 149.67 gm. in the second year and 150.82 gm per plant in the pooled mean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2401–2707 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea 2 per cent produced higher plant yields of 150.68, 148.20 and 149.44 gm. per plant.

Treatment
Urea 2 per cente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
150.68, 148.20 and 149.44 gm. per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Urea 2 per cent also produced the higher yield to the tune of 150.68, 148.20 and 149.44 gm. per plant respectively in the first year, second year and in pooled mean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2719–2902 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Baruwa Sagar significantly exceeded Rio-de-Janerio in hectare yield, with 286.02, 277.32 and 281.66 q/ha.

Material
Baruwa Sagare0
Outcome
Yield per hectaree0
Direction
superiore0
Value
286.02, 277.32, 281.66 q/hae0
Comparator
Rio-de-Janerioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield per hectare that variety V1 (Baruwa Sagar) sagar significantly superior to variety variety V2 (Rio-de-Janerio) in both the years as well as pooled mean. That yield values were 286.02, 277.32, 281.66 q/ha in first year second year and pooled mean, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2904–3170 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea significantly increased hectare yield in both years and pooled mean.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of urea also showed significantly increase in yield in both the years as well as in pooled mean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3171–3283 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 400 PPM gave maximum hectare yields of 301.39, 299.03 and 300.21 across years and pooled mean.

Treatment
NAA 400 PPMe0
Outcome
Yield per hectaree1
Direction
maximume0
Value
301.39, 299.03 and 300.21e0
Comparator
NAA 200 PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N2 (NAA 400 PPM) gave the maximum followed by N1¬ (NAA 200 PPM) and N0 (NAA O PPM) to the tune of 301.39, 299.03 and 300.21, 287.36, 284.03 and 265.69 and 235.56, 244.03 and 258.42 q/ha in first year second year and pooled mean respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3295–3540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2904–2921 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA 200 PPM ranked next in hectare yield and NAA O PPM last, with the reported year and pooled values.

Outcome
Yield per hectaree1
Value
287.36, 284.03 and 265.69 and 235.56, 244.03 and 258.42 q/hae0
Qualifier
N1¬ (NAA 200 PPM) and N0 (NAA O PPM)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N2 (NAA 400 PPM) gave the maximum followed by N1¬ (NAA 200 PPM) and N0 (NAA O PPM) to the tune of 301.39, 299.03 and 300.21, 287.36, 284.03 and 265.69 and 235.56, 244.03 and 258.42 q/ha in first year second year and pooled mean respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3295–3540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2904–2921 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Phosphorus deficiency reduced ginger fresh weight to 46.65% of control.

    Response of lack of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium to ginger · 2004 · compared with CK treatment

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.