Abstract
An experiment was conducted at the Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Rajasthan). The treatment comprises of three tillage practices in main plots viz. T1 – minimum tillage (MT), T2 – deep tillage (DT) and T3 – conventional tillage (CT) and six fertilizer management practices in sub plots i.e. (i) control (F0)(ii) recommended dose of NK fertilizer (F1) (iii) recommended dose of NPK fertilizer (RDF) (F2) (iv) RDF + phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) 2.5 Kg ha-1 (F3) (v) RDF + PSB 2.5 Kg ha-1 + Arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi (AMF) 2 Kg ha-1 (F4)(vi) RDF + PSB 2.5 Kg ha-1 + AMF 4 Kg ha-1 (F5). A total of 18 treatment combinations were laid out in split plot design and replicated four times. Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage. DT also recorded higher net return and B:C ratiocompared to MT. Among various fertilizer management practices,RDF along with seed inoculation with PSBand AMF recorded significantly higher growth, yield and yield parameters compared to RDF without seed inoculation. Also recorded the maximum net return and B:C ratio over rest of the fertilizer management practices. Thus, deep tillagealong with RDF + PSB + AMF (4 kg ha-1) enhanced groundnutyield attributes, yieldsand net returns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the number of pods per plant of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the number of kernels per pod of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- kernels per pode1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the number and dry weight of root nodules of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Organ / stage
- root nodulese1
- Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- number and dry weight of root nodulese1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the pod yield of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the seed index of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- seed indexe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the net return of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Deep tillage (DT)e1
- Outcome
- net returne2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- MTe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e1“Deep tillage (DT) produced significantly higher number of pods per plant, kernels per pod, number and dry weight of root nodules, pod yield and seed index as compared to minimum tillage”
e2“DT also recorded higher net return and B:C ratiocompared to MT”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage increased the B:C ratio of groundnut compared with minimum tillage.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e2“DT also recorded higher net return and B:C ratiocompared to MT”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with seed inoculation with PSB and AMF increased growth, yield and yield parameters of groundnut compared with RDF without seed inoculation.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculatione3
- Interactor
- AMFe3symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield parameterse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- RDF without seed inoculatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e3“Among various fertilizer management practices,RDF along with seed inoculation with PSBand AMF recorded significantly higher growth, yield and yield parameters compared to RDF without seed inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with seed inoculation with PSB and AMF gave the maximum net return of groundnut among the fertilizer management practices.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculatione3
- Interactor
- AMFe3symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Outcome
- net returne4
- Direction
- maximume4
- Comparator
- rest of the fertilizer management practicese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e3“Among various fertilizer management practices,RDF along with seed inoculation with PSBand AMF recorded significantly higher growth, yield and yield parameters compared to RDF without seed inoculation”
e4“Also recorded the maximum net return and B:C ratio over rest of the fertilizer management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF with seed inoculation with PSB and AMF gave the maximum B:C ratio of groundnut among the fertilizer management practices.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculatione3
- Interactor
- AMFe3symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe4
- Direction
- maximume4
- Comparator
- rest of the fertilizer management practicese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of groundnut”
e3“Among various fertilizer management practices,RDF along with seed inoculation with PSBand AMF recorded significantly higher growth, yield and yield parameters compared to RDF without seed inoculation”
e4“Also recorded the maximum net return and B:C ratio over rest of the fertilizer management practices”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →tillage · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.