Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Response of Wheat Yield and Protein-Related Quality on Late-Season Urea Application

Daniela Horvat; Krešimir Dvojković; Dario Novoselović; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted, aiming to evaluate whether the late-season foliar urea application (35 kg N ha−1) is effective in improving grain yield and protein-related quality in ten common wheat cultivars during two consecutive growing seasons. On average, late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields, thousand kernel, and hectolitre weight. The total grain protein significantly (p < 0.05) increased by 17.5% under urea application, while dough mixing behaviour was improved by increasing flour water absorption and reducing the degree of softening. Considering dough elastic properties, the changes in dough energy and maximum resistance under urea application were strongly cultivar dependent and their values compared to control varying from −12.7% to +42.4% and −25.1% to +7.7%, respectively. The distribution of grain storage proteins was significantly influenced by late urea application, but to a lesser extent than the total grain proteins. The proportion of total gliadins, α- and γ-gliadins increased by 5.3%, 5.8%, and 6.5%, respectively, while total glutenins and high-molecular weight glutenins decreased by 4.5% and 7.4%, respectively. In summary, the late-season application of urea has greatly improved the protein-related quality without considerable disruption of the storage proteins composition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season urea application significantly increased grain yield, thousand kernel weight and hectolitre weight of common wheat in field experiments.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
ten common wheat cultivarse1
Organ / stage
graine2
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
grain yields, thousand kernel, and hectolitre weighte2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Field experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“On average, late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields, thousand kernel, and hectolitre weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–373 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field experiments were conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea application increased total grain protein of common wheat by 17.5%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
graine4
Treatment
urea applicatione4
Outcome
total grain proteine4
Direction
increasede4
Value
17.5%e4
Setting
Field experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field experiments were conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“The total grain protein significantly (p < 0.05) increased by 17.5% under urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application improved dough mixing behaviour of common wheat by increasing flour water absorption and reducing degree of softening.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
dough mixing behavioure5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
by increasing flour water absorption and reducing the degree of softeninge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e5

“while dough mixing behaviour was improved by increasing flour water absorption and reducing the degree of softening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea application, the change in dough energy relative to control ranged from −12.7% to +42.4% depending on cultivar.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
under urea applicatione6
Outcome
dough energye6
Value
−12.7% to +42.4%e6
Qualifier
strongly cultivar dependente6
Comparator
controle6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e6

“the changes in dough energy and maximum resistance under urea application were strongly cultivar dependent and their values compared to control varying from −12.7% to +42.4% and −25.1% to +7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea application, the change in dough maximum resistance relative to control ranged from −25.1% to +7.7% depending on cultivar.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
under urea applicatione6
Outcome
maximum resistancee6
Value
−25.1% to +7.7%e6
Qualifier
strongly cultivar dependente6
Comparator
controle6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e6

“the changes in dough energy and maximum resistance under urea application were strongly cultivar dependent and their values compared to control varying from −12.7% to +42.4% and −25.1% to +7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application significantly influenced the distribution of grain storage proteins of common wheat, to a lesser extent than total grain protein.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
grain storage proteinse7
Treatment
late urea applicatione7
Outcome
distribution of grain storage proteinse7
Qualifier
to a lesser extent than the total grain proteinse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e7

“The distribution of grain storage proteins was significantly influenced by late urea application, but to a lesser extent than the total grain proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application increased the proportion of total gliadins in common wheat by 5.3%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
proportion of total gliadinse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
5.3%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“The proportion of total gliadins, α- and γ-gliadins increased by 5.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application increased α-gliadins of common wheat by 5.8%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
α- and γ-gliadinse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
5.8%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e4

“α- and γ-gliadins increased by 5.3%, 5.8%, and 6.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application increased γ-gliadins of common wheat by 6.5%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
γ-gliadinse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
6.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e4

“α- and γ-gliadins increased by 5.3%, 5.8%, and 6.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application decreased total glutenins of common wheat by 4.5%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
total gluteninse4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
4.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e4

“total glutenins and high-molecular weight glutenins decreased by 4.5% and 7.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late urea application decreased high-molecular weight glutenins of common wheat by 7.4%.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
late urea applicatione2
Outcome
high-molecular weight gluteninse4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
7.4%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ten common wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“late urea application significantly (p < 0.05) increased grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–333 · show in text ↑
e4

“total glutenins and high-molecular weight glutenins decreased by 4.5% and 7.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1182 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. no effect

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased grain protein content in both wheat crops by 15%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.