Paper · 2021 · Brazilian Journal of Experimental Design Data Analysis and Inferential Statistics

Assessment of cassava starch biofilm in the quality and shelf life of banana 'prata'

Sergio Thode Filho; Emanuele Nunes de Lima Figueiredo Jorge; Jose Armando Dos Santos Souza; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Brazil is now the world's fourth-largest banana producer in the world with an annual production of 6.953,747 tons per year. In Brazil, the banana ( Musa spp.) stands out, not only because it is the most widespread, but also because it is the most consumed by all social classes. Cassava is a renewable, almost unlimited resource and one of the most abundant substances in nature. It is one of the most important starchy root crops of the tropics used for food and industrial purposes. The present study evaluated the use of biofilms based on cassava starch in maintaining the quality and shelf life of the 'Prata' banana at room temperature. Initially, filmogenic solutions were produced using the casting technique for two treatments. T1 (2.6% starch / 500 mL of distilled water); T2 (2.6% starch / 500 mL of distilled water + 1 g of gelatin). Additionally, thickness, weight, and, subsequently, the biofilms were applied in the film-forming solution for 1 min and suspended for further drying at room temperature. After this process, were evaluated the loss of fresh mass, pH, and totals soluble solids. The present study revealed the efficiency of biofilm coating with and without gelatin to reduce the rate of enzymatic browning and increase the shelf life of bananas. It was possible to verify a smaller reduction in fresh weight loss in the treatments. Besides, no significant difference was observed in the addition of gelatin to the parameters evaluated in the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava starch biofilm coatings with and without gelatin reduced banana enzymatic browning.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
biofilm coating with and without gelatine0
Outcome
rate of enzymatic browninge0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biofilm coating with and without gelatin to reduce the rate of enzymatic browning and increase the shelf life of bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava starch biofilm coatings with and without gelatin increased banana shelf life.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
biofilm coating with and without gelatine0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biofilm coating with and without gelatin to reduce the rate of enzymatic browning and increase the shelf life of bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coatings led to a smaller reduction in banana fresh weight.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fresh weight losse0
Direction
smaller reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“It was possible to verify a smaller reduction in fresh weight loss in the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding gelatin did not significantly differ on evaluated banana fruit parameters.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
addition of gelatine0
Outcome
parameters evaluated in the fruite0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“no significant difference was observed in the addition of gelatin to the parameters evaluated in the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1475 · show in text ↑

gelatin · physiology: enzyme activity · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

gelatin · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · physiology: enzyme activity · MusaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

82 papers: 70 positive, 12 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.