Paper · 2022 · PeerJ

Cooperation between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting bacteria and their effects on plant growth and soil quality

Lu Yu; Hui Zhang; Wantong Zhang; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
69
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving nutrition uptake and soil quality have been well documented. However, few studies have explored their effects on root morphology and soil properties. In this study, we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR in order to explore their effects on plant growth, soil physicochemical properties, and soil enzyme activities. The results showed that AMF and/or PGPR inoculation significantly enhanced aboveground and belowground vegetation biomass. Both single and dual inoculations were beneficial for plant root length, surface area, root branches, stem diameter, height, and the ratio of shoot to root, but decreased root volume and root average diameter. Soil total nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and urease activities showed significant growth, and soil electrical conductivity and pH significantly declined under the inoculation treatments. Specific root length showed a negative correlation with belowground biomass, but a positive correlation with root length and root branches. These results indicated that AMF and PGPR had synergetic effects on root morphology, soil nutrient availability, and plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and/or PGPR inoculation significantly increased aboveground and belowground biomass.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse0
Treatment
AMF and/or PGPR inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
aboveground and belowground vegetation biomasse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that AMF and/or PGPR inoculation significantly enhanced aboveground and belowground vegetation biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and dual inoculations benefited root length, surface area and root branches.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse0
Treatment
single and dual inoculationse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
root length, surface area, root branchese1
Direction
beneficiale1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both single and dual inoculations were beneficial for plant root length, surface area, root branches, stem diameter, height, and the ratio of shoot to root, but decreased root volume and root average diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and dual inoculations benefited stem diameter, height and shoot to root ratio.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse0
Treatment
single and dual inoculationse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
stem diameter, height, and the ratio of shoot to roote1
Direction
beneficiale1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both single and dual inoculations were beneficial for plant root length, surface area, root branches, stem diameter, height, and the ratio of shoot to root, but decreased root volume and root average diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and dual inoculations decreased root volume and average diameter.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse0
Treatment
single and dual inoculationse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
root volume and root average diametere1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both single and dual inoculations were beneficial for plant root length, surface area, root branches, stem diameter, height, and the ratio of shoot to root, but decreased root volume and root average diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations significantly increased soil total nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase and urease activities.

Treatment
inoculation treatmentse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
Soil total nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and urease activitiese1
Direction
growthe1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil total nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and urease activities showed significant growth, and soil electrical conductivity and pH significantly declined under the inoculation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations significantly decreased soil electrical conductivity and pH.

Treatment
inoculation treatmentse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
soil electrical conductivity and pHe1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil electrical conductivity and pH significantly declined under the inoculation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–963 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific root length correlated negatively with belowground biomass.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse1
Outcome
Specific root lengthe0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
belowground biomasse0

Verbatim

e0

“Specific root length showed a negative correlation with belowground biomass, but a positive correlation with root length and root branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific root length correlated positively with root length and root branches.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse1
Outcome
Specific root lengthe0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
root length and root branchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Specific root length showed a negative correlation with belowground biomass, but a positive correlation with root length and root branches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret AMF and PGPR as having synergistic effects on root morphology, soil nutrient availability and plant growth.

Taxon
Elymus nutans GrisebCampeiostachys nutanse1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
root morphology, soil nutrient availability, and plant growthe0
Qualifier
synergetic effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicated that AMF and PGPR had synergetic effects on root morphology, soil nutrient availability, and plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“we inoculated Elymus nutans Griseb with AMF and/or PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–329 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Campeiostachys nutansResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Campeiostachys nutansResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.