Paper · 2022 · The ISME Journal

Identification of beneficial and detrimental bacteria impacting sorghum responses to drought using multi-scale and multi-system microbiome comparisons

Mingsheng Qi; Jeffrey C Berry; Kira W Veley; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
91
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress limiting agricultural productivity. Previous field-level experiments have demonstrated that drought decreases microbiome diversity in the root and rhizosphere. How these changes ultimately affect plant health remains elusive. Toward this end, we combined reductionist, transitional and ecological approaches, applied to the staple cereal crop sorghum to identify key root-associated microbes that robustly affect drought-stressed plant phenotypes. Fifty-three Arabidopsis-associated bacteria were applied to sorghum seeds and their effect on root growth was monitored. Two Arthrobacter strains caused root growth inhibition (RGI) in Arabidopsis and sorghum. In the context of synthetic communities, Variovorax strains were able to protect plants from Arthrobacter-caused RGI. As a transitional system, high-throughput phenotyping was used to test the synthetic communities. During drought stress, plants colonized by Arthrobacter had reduced growth and leaf water content. Plants colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovorax performed as well or better than control plants. In parallel, we performed a field trial wherein sorghum was evaluated across drought conditions. By incorporating data on soil properties into the microbiome analysis, we accounted for experimental noise with a novel method and were able to observe the negative correlation between the abundance of Arthrobacter and plant growth. Having validated this approach, we cross-referenced datasets from the high-throughput phenotyping and field experiments and report a list of bacteria with high confidence that positively associated with plant growth under drought stress. In conclusion, a three-tiered experimental system successfully spanned the lab-to-field gap and identified beneficial and deleterious bacterial strains for sorghum under drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Arthrobacter strains inhibited root growth in Arabidopsis and sorghum.

Taxon
Arabidopsis and sorghumArabidopsisSorghume0
Treatment
Arthrobacter strainse0
Interactor
Arthrobacter strainse0other
Outcome
root growth inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
Twoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Arthrobacter strains caused root growth inhibition (RGI) in Arabidopsis and sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variovorax strains protected plants from Arthrobacter-induced root growth inhibition in synthetic communities.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Variovorax strainse0
Interactor
ArthrobacterArthrobactere0other
Second interactor
Variovorax strainse0other
Outcome
Arthrobacter-caused RGIe0
Direction
protecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arthrobacter
Arthrobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMicrobeteacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the context of synthetic communities, Variovorax strains were able to protect plants from Arthrobacter-caused RGI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–809 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During drought, Arthrobacter-colonized plants had reduced growth and leaf water content.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
ArthrobacterArthrobactere0other
Outcome
growth and leaf water contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
During drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arthrobacter
Arthrobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMicrobeteacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During drought stress, plants colonized by Arthrobacter had reduced growth and leaf water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovorax performed as well as or better than controls.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovoraxe0
Interactor
ArthrobacterArthrobactere0other
Second interactor
VariovoraxVariovoraxe0other
Outcome
performede0
Direction
as well or bettere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arthrobacter
Arthrobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMicrobeteacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovorax performed as well or better than control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field Arthrobacter abundance correlated negatively with sorghum growth.

Taxon
plante0
Interactor
ArthrobacterArthrobactere0other
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arthrobacter
Arthrobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMicrobeteacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlation between the abundance of Arthrobacter and plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1438 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-referenced datasets identified bacteria positively associated with drought-stressed plant growth.

Taxon
plante0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0other
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
positively associatede0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Verbatim

e0

“report a list of bacteria with high confidence that positively associated with plant growth under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1676 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three-tiered experimental system connected laboratory and field results to identify beneficial and detrimental sorghum bacteria.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
identified beneficial and deleterious bacterial strainse0
Qualifier
under droughte0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a three-tiered experimental system successfully spanned the lab-to-field gap and identified beneficial and deleterious bacterial strains for sorghum under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1855 · show in text ↑

Arthrobacter · disease · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Arthrobacter · disease · ArabidopsisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.