Paper · 2022 · Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research

Effect of Rhizobium Inoculation and Phosphate Rock Fertilizer Application on Biomass Production, Nutrient use Efficiency and Yield Parameters of Green Gram (Vigna radiata)

F. K. Mbaka; H. O. Ndukhu; G. O. Oloo-Abucheli; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was focused on an ecologically sound and highly production of legumes particularly green gram through the application of Rhizobium and rock phosphate fertilizer. Therefore, biomass production, nutrient use efficiency and yield parameters were determined for two growing seasons (November 2019 - January 2020 and February - April 2020), at Chuka university horticultural research farm. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in green grams can improve sustainable soil fertility management and increased production. In Kenya, green gram is a major source of food security particularly in Tharaka Nithi County. However, green gram yields are usually low due to low phosphorous and nitrogen levels of the soil. A factorial experiment of 2 x 2 x 2 was laid out in a randomized complete block design. There were three factors, varieties (N26-nylon and KS20-uncle), phosphate rock (0 and 30 kg P ha-1) and Rhizobium MEA 716 (0 and 100 g ha-1) making a total of eight treatments which were replicated three times. Soil sampling and analyses were done before planting and after harvesting of green grams. Data on grain yield, total dry biomass, shoot and root dry weights. Phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) were done. Data was analysed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS). Significant means were separated using Least Significant Difference (LSD) at probability level of 5 %. Results for both wet and dry seasons indicated that variety KS20 under Rhizobium inoculation and phosphate rock fertilizer (R1P1V2) showed significantly (P<0.05) higher increase in shoot dry biomass (52.01 g plant-1), root dry biomass (7.60 g plant-1), total dry biomass (146.4 g plant-1), number of pods (84 plant-1) and yield (2158 kg ha-1). Also, there was significant (P<0.05) higher phosphorous use efficiency of 279.32 Kg/ha and nitrogen use efficiency of 1732 kg/ha in treatment R1P1V2 over other treatments. From these results it was concluded that variety KS20 (V2) performed better compared to N26 (V1) under combined application of Rhizobium and phosphate rock fertilizer. Hence, based on the findings, for sustainable and improved green gram production farmers in Tharaka Nithi County.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment in KS20 increased shoot dry biomass to 52.01 g plant-1.

Material
KS20e0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation and phosphate rock fertilizere0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
higher increasee0
Value
52.01 g plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety KS20 under Rhizobium inoculation and phosphate rock fertilizer (R1P1V2) showed significantly (P<0.05) higher increase in shoot dry biomass (52.01 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment in KS20 increased root dry biomass to 7.60 g plant-1.

Outcome
root dry biomasse0
Value
7.60 g plant-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry biomass (7.60 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment in KS20 increased total dry biomass to 146.4 g plant-1.

Outcome
total dry biomasse0
Value
146.4 g plant-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total dry biomass (146.4 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment in KS20 increased pods to 84 plant-1.

Outcome
number of podse0
Value
84 plant-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods (84 plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment in KS20 increased yield to 2158 kg ha-1.

Outcome
yielde0
Value
2158 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (2158 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R1P1V2 had higher phosphorus use efficiency of 279.32 Kg/ha than other treatments.

Treatment
R1P1V2e0
Outcome
phosphorous use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
279.32 Kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant (P<0.05) higher phosphorous use efficiency of 279.32 Kg/ha and nitrogen use efficiency of 1732 kg/ha in treatment R1P1V2 over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R1P1V2 had higher nitrogen use efficiency of 1732 kg/ha than other treatments.

Treatment
R1P1V2e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1732 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher phosphorous use efficiency of 279.32 Kg/ha and nitrogen use efficiency of 1732 kg/ha in treatment R1P1V2 over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KS20 performed better than N26 under combined Rhizobium and phosphate fertilizer.

Material
KS20e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
performed bettere0
Comparator
N26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety KS20 (V2) performed better compared to N26 (V1) under combined application of Rhizobium and phosphate rock fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–155 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 66 positive, 2 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.