Paper · 2021 · National Journal of Biological Sciences

Assessing the Impact of Proline and Abscisic Acid on SaltStress Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination andSeedling Establishment

Sidra Saleem; Mamoona Rauf; Muhammad Yousaf; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abiotic stress such as Salinity causes serious challenge to plant growth and development, so it causes negative influence on plant's growth and yield. Different growth regulators and osmolytes kept attention as productive strategy and help the plant for enhancing stress tolerance and plant' growth and yield improved under stress condition. This project investigates the performance of Brassica napus at germination and seedling stage after application of abscisic acid and proline with combination of salt stress. Experiment was designed in completely randomized manner and petri plates were arranged in different sets with 10 seeds/each and applied with different concentrations of NaCl solutions. Proline (10 -20mM) and ABA (50-100mg/L) was pplied separately and in combination (proline 10 x ABA 50) and (proline 20 x 100) in these sets. After 8 days experiment was terminated and different parameters (germination percentage, seedling growth, shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, Reletive water content, (RWC) Water content (WC), Root Shoot Ratio (RSR), Shoot Weight Ratio (SWR) and Root Weight Rratio (RWR). Salt stress exhibited significant decrease in shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, RWC, different ratios (SWR, RWR) and different physiological indices while RSR exhibited increase in comparison to control in all sets. According to this research the application of proline and abscisic acid alone showed increased performance in all studied parameters. Interactions of proline and ABA did not support germination and seedling establishment process. This study concluded that application of proline (10mM) and ABA (100mg/L) improved germination and seedling establishment process very well as compared to other doses in Brasicca napus

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly decreases shoot and root length of Brassica napus relative to control.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress exhibited significant decrease in shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, RWC, different ratios (SWR, RWR) and different physiological indices while RSR exhibited increase in comparison to control in all sets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly decreases fresh and dry biomass and vigor index of Brassica napus relative to control.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
fresh and dry biomass, vigor indexe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress exhibited significant decrease in shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, RWC, different ratios (SWR, RWR) and different physiological indices while RSR exhibited increase in comparison to control in all sets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly decreases relative water content of Brassica napus relative to control.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress exhibited significant decrease in shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, RWC, different ratios (SWR, RWR) and different physiological indices while RSR exhibited increase in comparison to control in all sets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increases the root shoot ratio (RSR) of Brassica napus relative to control.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
RSRe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress exhibited significant decrease in shoot and root length, fresh and dry biomass, vigor index, RWC, different ratios (SWR, RWR) and different physiological indices while RSR exhibited increase in comparison to control in all sets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and abscisic acid applied alone increase performance of Brassica napus in all studied parameters.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
application of proline and abscisic acid alonee1
Outcome
performance in all studied parameterse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“According to this research the application of proline and abscisic acid alone showed increased performance in all studied parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined proline and ABA do not support germination and seedling establishment of Brassica napus.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Interactions of proline and ABAe2
Outcome
germination and seedling establishment processe2
Direction
did not supporte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Interactions of proline and ABA did not support germination and seedling establishment process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline (10 mM) and ABA (100 mg/L) improve germination and seedling establishment of Brassica napus better than other doses.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
application of proline (10mM) and ABA (100mg/L)e3
Outcome
germination and seedling establishment processe3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
other dosese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“This study concluded that application of proline (10mM) and ABA (100mg/L) improved germination and seedling establishment process very well as compared to other doses in Brasicca napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grown BRASSICA NAPUS at Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–99 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

proline · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 11 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

salinity · soil: physics · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.