Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Higher Returns through Intercropping and Mulching in Irrigated Finger Millet Cultivation

R. Vishalini; D. Rajakumar; M. Joseph; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam to achieve enhanced remuneration and profit margin in irrigated finger millet through intercropping and mulching. Among mulching, the highest gross return (Rs.68,336/- ha-1) and B:C ratio of 2.16 was obtained in rice straw mulch (M1) which was followed by M2 (shredded coconut waste mulch) with a gross return of Rs.63,635/- ha-1 and B:C ratio of 2.01. Similar trend in net return was observed because of higher crop yield. The lowest B:C ratio of 1.69 was realized under un-mulched. Among the intercropping, the highest gross return (Rs.1,08,255/- ha-1) was fetched in small onion intercrop followed by I4 (palak intercrop). The highest B:C ratio of 2.66 was obtained in small onion intercrop which was followed by palak intercrop. The combination of rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop recorded the highest gross and net returns of Rs.1,21,178/- and Rs.80,489/- respectively with B:C ratio of 2.98. The same intercrop with shredded coconut mulch was also proved to be the next best combination. Un-mulched non intercropped treatment (M0I0) registered the lowest B:C of 1.22 followed by shredded coconut waste mulch (M2I0) (1.25) due to lower productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch gave the highest gross return, Rs.68,336/- ha-1.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.68,336/- ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest gross return (Rs.68,336/- ha-1) and B:C ratio of 2.16 was obtained in rice straw mulch (M1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch gave a B:C ratio of 2.16, the highest among mulch treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest gross return (Rs.68,336/- ha-1) and B:C ratio of 2.16 was obtained in rice straw mulch (M1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shredded coconut waste mulch produced gross return of Rs.63,635/- ha-1.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
shredded coconut waste mulche0
Outcome
gross returne0
Value
Rs.63,635/- ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M2 (shredded coconut waste mulch) with a gross return of Rs.63,635/- ha-1 and B:C ratio of 2.01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shredded coconut waste mulch gave a B:C ratio of 2.01.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
shredded coconut waste mulche0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
2.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M2 (shredded coconut waste mulch) with a gross return of Rs.63,635/- ha-1 and B:C ratio of 2.01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return followed the same mulch ranking because crop yield was higher.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend in net return was observed because of higher crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched plots had the lowest B:C ratio, 1.69.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
un-mulchede0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.69e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest B:C ratio of 1.69 was realized under un-mulched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small onion intercropping gave the highest gross return, Rs.1,08,255/- ha-1.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
small onion intercrope0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.1,08,255/- ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest gross return (Rs.1,08,255/- ha-1) was fetched in small onion intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small onion intercropping produced the highest B:C ratio, 2.66.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
small onion intercrope0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.66e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest B:C ratio of 2.66 was obtained in small onion intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch combined with small onion intercrop gave the highest gross return, Rs.1,21,178/-.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
rice straw mulch with small onion intercrope0
Outcome
grosse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.1,21,178/-e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop recorded the highest gross and net returns of Rs.1,21,178/- and Rs.80,489/- respectively with B:C ratio of 2.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop gave the highest net return, Rs.80,489/-.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
rice straw mulch with small onion intercrope0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.80,489/-e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop recorded the highest gross and net returns of Rs.1,21,178/- and Rs.80,489/- respectively with B:C ratio of 2.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop gave a B:C ratio of 2.98.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
rice straw mulch with small onion intercrope0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
2.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice straw mulch with small onion intercrop recorded the highest gross and net returns of Rs.1,21,178/- and Rs.80,489/- respectively with B:C ratio of 2.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small onion intercrop with shredded coconut mulch was the next best combination.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
shredded coconut mulche0
Outcome
next best combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same intercrop with shredded coconut mulch was also proved to be the next best combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched, nonintercropped treatment had the lowest B:C ratio, 1.22.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Un-mulched non intercropped treatmente0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Un-mulched non intercropped treatment (M0I0) registered the lowest B:C of 1.22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shredded coconut waste mulch without intercropping had B:C ratio of 1.25.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
shredded coconut waste mulche0
Outcome
B:Ce0
Value
1.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Un-mulched non intercropped treatment (M0I0) registered the lowest B:C of 1.22 followed by shredded coconut waste mulch (M2I0) (1.25) due to lower productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.