Paper · 2002 · Agronomy Journal

Improved Yield Potential with an Early Planting Cotton Production System

William T. Pettigrew

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mid-South cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) has reached a yield plateau in recent years. Shifting the growing season earlier in the year by planting earlier may allow the crop to develop under more favorable weather patterns and escape late season insects. The objectives were to determine the effect of early planting on growth and development, lint yield, and fiber quality of cotton. Early season dry matter partitioning, early season light interception, weekly bloom counts, lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality data were collected on genotypes planted during the first week of April (early planting) and the first week of May (normal planting). The data were collected from two experiments conducted over the years 1996 to 2000. Early June leaf area index of the early planted plants was 172% greater than plants in the normal planting, which contributed to a 55% greater canopy light interception for the early planting at that time. Early planting shifted the blooming period earlier in the growing season every year but 1997. Four out of 5 yr, the early planted cotton demonstrated a 10% yield improvement over the normal planted crop. In 1997, the early planted crop was stunted by an early season cold period, and yet its yields were equivalent to the normal planted crop. Planting earlier than normal has the potential to provide for increased lint yields for Mississippi Delta cotton producers. Techniques to mitigate early cold temperature stress could help make the yield improvements found with this early planting production system more consistent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting produced 172% greater early June leaf area index than normal planting.

Treatment
early planted plantse0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
172%e0
Comparator
normal plantinge0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early June leaf area index of the early planted plants was 172% greater than plants in the normal planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting produced 55% greater canopy light interception at that time.

Treatment
early plantinge0
Outcome
canopy light interceptione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which contributed to a 55% greater canopy light interception for the early planting at that time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting shifted blooming earlier in all years except 1997.

Treatment
early plantinge0
Outcome
blooming periode0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early planting shifted the blooming period earlier in the growing season every year but 1997”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planted cotton yielded 10% more than normal planted cotton in four of five years.

Treatment
early planted cottone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
normal planted crope0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four out of 5 yr, the early planted cotton demonstrated a 10% yield improvement over the normal planted crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cold-affected 1997, early planted cotton yields equaled those of normally planted cotton.

Treatment
early planted crope0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Qualifier
1997e0
Comparator
normal planted crope0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1997, the early planted crop was stunted by an early season cold period, and yet its yields were equivalent to the normal planted crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting may increase lint yields for Mississippi Delta cotton producers.

Outcome
Planting earlier than normale0
Setting
Mississippi Deltae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting earlier than normal has the potential to provide for increased lint yields for Mississippi Delta cotton producers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1413 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress mitigation could make early planting yield gains more consistent.

Outcome
Techniques to mitigate early cold temperature stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Techniques to mitigate early cold temperature stress could help make the yield improvements found with this early planting production system more consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑

sowing time · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Normal sowing gave higher seed weight than late sowing.

    The effects of sowing date on cottonseed properties at different fruiting-branch positions · 2017 · compared with late sowing treatments (25 May and 10 June)

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.