Abstract
Abstract Field tests were conducted during 2001 and 2002 in northeastern North Carolina to evaluate the impact of cultural practices and in-furrow insecticides on the incidence of Tomato spotted wilt virus (genus Tospovirus, family Bunyaviridae, TSWV), which is transmitted to peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., primarily by tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca Hinds (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Treatments included in row plant populations of 7, 13, and 17 plants per meter; the virginia market-type ‘NC V-11’ and ‘Perry’; planting dates of early and late May; and phorate and aldicarb insecticide applied in-furrow. The incidence of plants expressing visual symptoms of spotted wilt was recorded from mid-June through mid-September. Treatment factors that reduced the incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptoms included establishing higher plant densities, delaying planting from early May until late May, and applying the in-furrow insecticide phorate. Peanut cultivar did not have a consistent, significant effect on the incidence of symptomatic plants in this experiment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Higher planting density reduced spotted wilt symptom incidence.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- establishing higher plant densitiese0
- Interactor
- Tomato spotted wilt virus
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculaee1pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptomse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“reduced the incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptoms included establishing higher plant densities”
e1“Tomato spotted wilt virus”
Claim · model-written summary
Late May planting reduced spotted wilt symptom incidence relative to early May.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- late Maye0
- Outcome
- incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptomse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- early Maye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“delaying planting from early May until late May”
e1“reduced the incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptoms”
Claim · model-written summary
In-furrow phorate reduced spotted wilt symptom incidence.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- in-furrow insecticide phoratee0
- Outcome
- incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptomse1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“applying the in-furrow insecticide phorate”
e1“reduced the incidence of symptoms of plants expressing spotted wilt symptoms”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut cultivar had no consistent significant effect on symptomatic plant incidence.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- cultivare0
- Outcome
- incidence of symptomatic plantse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut cultivar did not have a consistent, significant effect on the incidence of symptomatic plants”
The same questions in other papers
phorate · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →density · Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →insecticide · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.