Paper · 2003 · Agronomy Journal

Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat

Anthony G. Bly; Howard J. Woodard

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar N applications on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) have increased grain protein. Foliar N timing evaluations have been minimal. The objectives were (i) determine the optimal timing of foliar N for increased grain protein of hard red winter wheat (HRWW) and spring wheat (HRSW), (ii) evaluate effect of foliar N on grain yield, and (iii) determine relationship of grain protein to foliar N application and grain yield. Foliar N was applied at Feekes stage 10.0 (boot) or 10.8 (postpollination) on two cultivars of HRWW and HRSW each year from 1995 to 2000. The foliar N rate (33.7 kg N ha−1) was applied as 1:1 solution of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) and water. Fertilizer N for a 3360 kg ha−1 grain yield goal was broadcast as UAN after planting. Soil type was Estelline silt loam (fine-silty over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Calcic Hapludoll). Postpollination foliar N gave the highest grain protein during all years. Grain yield was significantly reduced 5% by boot stage foliar N for HRSW. Neither timing application significantly reduced HRWW grain yield. All wheat data were pooled to relate grain yield level and protein response to foliar N. Grain protein and yield from plots without foliar N were inversely related (r2 = 0.57). Postpollination foliar N increased protein 70% of the time when yield goal was exceeded compared with only 23% when it was not. These results show that postpollination foliar N gave higher grain protein and was most effective when planned yield goal was exceeded.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination foliar nitrogen gave the highest grain protein in all years.

Treatment
Postpollination foliar Ne0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
during all yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postpollination foliar N gave the highest grain protein during all years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
boot stage foliar Ne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly reduced 5% by boot stage foliar N for HRSW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (HRSW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither foliar nitrogen timing significantly reduced winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
hard red winter wheate1
Treatment
timing applicatione0
Outcome
HRWW grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Neither timing application significantly reduced HRWW grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“hard red winter wheat (HRWW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated wheat grain protein and yield were inversely related.

Treatment
without foliar Ne0
Outcome
Grain protein and yielde0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Value
r2 = 0.57e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein and yield from plots without foliar N were inversely related (r2 = 0.57).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination foliar nitrogen increased protein in 70% of cases when yield goal was exceeded versus 23% otherwise.

Treatment
Postpollination foliar Ne0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
only 23%e0
Comparator
when it was note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postpollination foliar N increased protein 70% of the time when yield goal was exceeded compared with only 23% when it was not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1391 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–53 · show in text ↑

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.