Paper · 2010 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

The Influence of Humic Acid Treatment on The Performance and Water Requirements of Plum Trees Planted in Calcareous Soil

El-Shall, S.; Abd El-Messeih, W.M.; Abd El Megeed, Nagwa.A.; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Research was conducted at the Nubaria Horticultural Research Station, El-Bohira Governorate in Egypt’s calcareous soil to determine the effect of humic acid amendments and flood irrigation scheduling on the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum). The research was conducted over a four year period beginning in 2005 when the plum fruit trees had developed for 2 years having budded on a Mariana rootstock. Tests were conducted during 2006- 2009 growing seasons. The main and interacting effects of flood irrigation frequency and humic acid amendments were tested using a split-plot design experimental set-up. Kelsey plum was planted at a spacing of 4 x 5 m under a flood irrigation system in calcareous soils. The trees were irrigated under three regimes, which were: 5-day (I1), 10-day (I2) and 15-day (I3) interval. The humic acid treatments (thereafter referred to as HA) included: humic acid soil application around tree’s trunk (T1), foliar application (T2), soil and foliar application (T3) and a control (T4) whereby no humic acid treatment was made. HA treatments were applied on the months of April, May, June and July during each of the years (2006-2009). During 2006 and 2007 vegetative growth measurements and leaf mineral contents were measured. In 2008 and 2009 when the plum trees had attained maturation and had reached their reproductive stage, the fruit quality and yield were determined. Each of the humic acid additions in either soil or foliar application method increased the physical attributes (vegetative) of the trees during the first and second seasons of growth relative to the control. The combined foliar and soil applications of humic acid (T3) increased tree height and Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCA); shoot number, length and diameter during 2006 and 2007 seasons compared to all other treatments. The largest combined effect of irrigation and humic acid treatments during the vegetative seasons (2006 and 2007)on the plum trees was observed for the T3 I2 treatment, followed by the T3 I1 and T1 I2 in that order. The vegetative growth parameters highlighted the importance of humic acid and its usefulness in increasing water use efficiency for the 10-day irrigation interval as compared to the 5-day interval. Foliar and soil humic acid treatment significantly induced high leaf contents of both macro- and micro- minerals (N, P, K, Fe, Mn and Zn). The soil mode of application T1 was inferior to the foliar mode of humic acid application (T2) during the growing seasons of 2006 and 2007. In the two studied years 2008 and 2009, the highest yield with good fruit quality was obtained from trees under T3, so it recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each humic acid application, in soil or as foliar spray, increased vegetative attributes of plum trees relative to the control in the first and second seasons.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
humic acid additions in either soil or foliar application methode1
Outcome
physical attributes (vegetative)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Each of the humic acid additions in either soil or foliar application method increased the physical attributes (vegetative) of the trees during the first and second seasons of growth relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar and soil humic acid application (T3) increased tree height and trunk cross-sectional area compared with all other treatments in 2006 and 2007.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
combined foliar and soil applications of humic acid (T3)e2
Outcome
tree height and Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCA)e2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
all other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combined foliar and soil applications of humic acid (T3) increased tree height and Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCA); shoot number, length and diameter during 2006 and 2007 seasons compared to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar and soil humic acid application (T3) increased shoot number, length and diameter compared with all other treatments in 2006 and 2007.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
combined foliar and soil applications of humic acid (T3)e2
Outcome
shoot number, length and diametere2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
all other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combined foliar and soil applications of humic acid (T3) increased tree height and Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCA); shoot number, length and diameter during 2006 and 2007 seasons compared to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest combined effect of irrigation and humic acid treatments on plum trees was found for the T3 I2 treatment, followed by T3 I1 and T1 I2.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
T3 I2 treatmente4
Outcome
combined effect of irrigation and humic acid treatmentse4
Direction
largeste4
Comparator
T3 I1 and T1 I2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“The largest combined effect of irrigation and humic acid treatments during the vegetative seasons (2006 and 2007)on the plum trees was observed for the T3 I2 treatment, followed by the T3 I1 and T1 I2 in that order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid was useful for increasing water use efficiency on plum trees at the 10-day irrigation interval compared with the 5-day interval.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
10-day irrigation intervale5
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
increasinge5
Comparator
5-day intervale5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e5

“highlighted the importance of humic acid and its usefulness in increasing water use efficiency for the 10-day irrigation interval as compared to the 5-day interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and soil humic acid treatment significantly induced high leaf contents of N, P and K in plum trees.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
Foliar and soil humic acid treatmente6
Outcome
leaf contents of both macro- and micro- mineralse6
Direction
highe6
Qualifier
N, P, Ke6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e6

“Foliar and soil humic acid treatment significantly induced high leaf contents of both macro- and micro- minerals (N, P, K, Fe, Mn and Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2268–2405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and soil humic acid treatment significantly induced high leaf contents of Fe, Mn and Zn in plum trees.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
Foliar and soil humic acid treatmente6
Outcome
leaf contents of both macro- and micro- mineralse6
Direction
highe6
Qualifier
Fe, Mn and Zne6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e6

“Foliar and soil humic acid treatment significantly induced high leaf contents of both macro- and micro- minerals (N, P, K, Fe, Mn and Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2268–2405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil mode of humic acid application (T1) was inferior to the foliar mode (T2) during the 2006 and 2007 growing seasons.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
soil mode of application T1e7
Outcome
inferiore7
Direction
inferiore7
Comparator
foliar mode of humic acid application (T2)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil mode of application T1 was inferior to the foliar mode of humic acid application (T2) during the growing seasons of 2006 and 2007. In the two studied years 2008 and 2009, the highest yield with good fruit quality was obtained from trees under T3, so it recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2407–2680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 and 2009 the highest yield with good fruit quality was obtained from plum trees under T3.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Treatment
T3e7
Outcome
yield with good fruit qualitye7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil mode of application T1 was inferior to the foliar mode of humic acid application (T2) during the growing seasons of 2006 and 2007. In the two studied years 2008 and 2009, the highest yield with good fruit quality was obtained from trees under T3, so it recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2407–2680 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the T3 humic acid treatment for plum trees.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Outcome
T3e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development and growth of Prunus domestica L. (Kelsy plum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–265 · show in text ↑
e7

“The soil mode of application T1 was inferior to the foliar mode of humic acid application (T2) during the growing seasons of 2006 and 2007. In the two studied years 2008 and 2009, the highest yield with good fruit quality was obtained from trees under T3, so it recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2407–2680 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.