Paper · 1984 · American Journal of Botany

Dynamics of Arbuscule Development and Degeneration in a Zea Mays Mycorrhiza

Ronald Toth; R. Michael Miller

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A quantitative light and electron microscope study of developing and degenerating mycorrhizal arbuscules of Glomus fasciculatum in Zea mays was carried out in order to estimate three parameters during the colonization cycle. These were: 1) Vv(f,c), the fraction of the host cell volume occupied by a volume of fungus; 2) Vv(cy,c), the fraction of the host cell volume occupied by host cytoplasm; 3) Sv(pr,c), the surface-area-to-volume ratio of the host protoplast to the whole host cell. Uninfected cortical cells had an Sv(pr,c) of 0.13 μm2/μm3. As the fungus penetrates the cell wall, the protoplast invaginates, causing a decrease in protoplast volume and an increase in protoplast Sv. The Sv(pr,c) of a cell containing a mature arbuscule is 1.275 μm2/μm3. Because of the shrinkage of the protoplast, the Sv of the protoplast to its own volume rather than the original cell volume is 2.55 μm2/μm3, or almost a 20-fold increase. Total cell size is unaffected. When the arbuscule is mature, the fungus occupies 42% of the cell, with 24% as 1-μm-diam branches, and 18% as trunk. Arbuscular branch formation progresses at a linear rate and is the most important factor in causing the increased host Sv. The correlation coefficient for Vv(br,c) the volume fraction for arbuscular branches, vs. Sv(pr,c) is r = 0.932 (P < 0.001). Degeneration of the arbuscule is marked by a rapid decrease in branches, host Sv, and host cytoplasm. The trunk develops and degenerates at a slower rate than the branches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninfected cortical cells of Zea mays had a protoplast surface-to-cell-volume ratio Sv(pr,c) of 0.13 μm2/μm3.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cortical cellse0
Outcome
Sv(pr,c)e0
Value
0.13 μm2/μm3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Uninfected cortical cells had an Sv(pr,c) of 0.13 μm2/μm3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As the fungus penetrates the cell wall, the protoplast invaginates and protoplast volume decreases.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
protoplast volumee0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“As the fungus penetrates the cell wall, the protoplast invaginates, causing a decrease in protoplast volume and an increase in protoplast Sv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As the fungus penetrates the cell wall, protoplast Sv increases.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
protoplast Sve0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“As the fungus penetrates the cell wall, the protoplast invaginates, causing a decrease in protoplast volume and an increase in protoplast Sv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sv(pr,c) of a cell containing a mature arbuscule is 1.275 μm2/μm3.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
Sv(pr,c)e0
Value
1.275 μm2/μm3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Sv(pr,c) of a cell containing a mature arbuscule is 1.275 μm2/μm3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sv of the protoplast relative to its own volume is 2.55 μm2/μm3, almost a 20-fold increase.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
Sv of the protoplast to its own volumee0
Value
2.55 μm2/μm3e0
Qualifier
almost a 20-fold increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Sv of the protoplast to its own volume rather than the original cell volume is 2.55 μm2/μm3, or almost a 20-fold increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total cell size is unaffected.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
Total cell sizee0
Direction
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total cell size is unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When the arbuscule is mature, the fungus occupies 42% of the host cell.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
fungus occupiese0
Value
42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the arbuscule is mature, the fungus occupies 42% of the cell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the mature arbuscule, 24% of the cell is occupied by 1-μm-diam branches.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
1-μm-diam branchese0
Value
24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 24% as 1-μm-diam branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the mature arbuscule, 18% of the cell is occupied by trunk.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
trunke0
Value
18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“and 18% as trunk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1078 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular branch formation progresses at a linear rate.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
Arbuscular branch formatione0
Qualifier
linear ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Arbuscular branch formation progresses at a linear rate and is the most important factor in causing the increased host Sv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1201 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular branch formation is the most important factor causing the increased host Sv.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
increased host Sve0
Qualifier
Arbuscular branch formatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Arbuscular branch formation progresses at a linear rate and is the most important factor in causing the increased host Sv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The volume fraction of arbuscular branches Vv(br,c) correlated with Sv(pr,c) at r = 0.932.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
Sv(pr,c)e0
Value
r = 0.932e0
Comparator
Vv(br,c)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The correlation coefficient for Vv(br,c) the volume fraction for arbuscular branches, vs. Sv(pr,c) is r = 0.932 (P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degeneration of the arbuscule is marked by a rapid decrease in branches, host Sv and host cytoplasm.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
branches, host Sv, and host cytoplasme0
Direction
rapid decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Degeneration of the arbuscule is marked by a rapid decrease in branches, host Sv, and host cytoplasm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trunk develops and degenerates at a slower rate than the branches.

Taxon
Zea MaysZea mayst0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
the branchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea Mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The trunk develops and degenerates at a slower rate than the branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1499 · show in text ↑