Paper · 1967 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Acaricides Screened Against Two Rust Mites of Citrus1

D. K. Reed; C. R. Crittenden; D. J. Lyon

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sixty-three chemical compounds were screened at Orlando, Florida, in 1963 and 1964 against 2 species of eriophyid mites—the citrus rust mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead), and Aculus pelekassi (Keifer) — on citrus. Initial tests were made at a concentration of 20 ppm with infested seedling leaves that had been dipped into acetone suspensions of each chemical. Promising compounds were retested at a concentration of 2 ppm, and several that appeared effective against 1 or both species were tested at concentrations below 2 ppm. The most promising compounds against both species of mites were Chloropropylate® (isopropyl 4,4'-dichlorobenzilate), Stauffer N-4539 (O-isopropyl ethylphosphonodithioate S-ester with N (mercaptomethyl)phthalimide), Stauffer N4543 (O-isobutyl ethylphosphonodithioate S-ester with N-(mercaptomethyl)-phthalimide), NIA 9241 (O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with 6-chloro-3-(mercaptomethyl)-2-benzoxazolinone), Thompson-Hayward TPTC (tiphenyltin chloride) and Thompson-Hayward TPTH (triphenyltin hydroxide) Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate) and Shell SD-9129 (3-hydroxy-N-methyl.cis-crotonamide dimethyl phosphate) gave excellent results against A. pelekassi but very poor results against P. oleivora, which is the mite of greatest economic importance. Nabac (2,2'-methylenebis[3,4,6-trichlorophenol]) was promising against P. oleivora but not strongly toxic to A. pelekassi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six compounds were the most promising against both mite species on citrus.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
Chloropropylate®e0
Interactor
mitese0pest
Outcome
most promisinge0
Direction
most promisinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most promising compounds against both species of mites were Chloropropylate® (isopropyl 4,4'-dichlorobenzilate), Stauffer N-4539 (O-isopropyl ethylphosphonodithioate S-ester with N (mercaptomethyl)phthalimide), Stauffer N4543 (O-isobutyl ethylphosphonodithioate S-ester with N-(mercaptomethyl)-phthalimide), NIA 9241 (O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with 6-chloro-3-(mercaptomethyl)-2-benzoxazolinone), Thompson-Hayward TPTC (tiphenyltin chloride) and Thompson-Hayward TPTH (triphenyltin hydroxide)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bayer 37344 gave excellent results against A. pelekassi but poor results against P. oleivora.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
Bayer 37344e0
Interactor
A. pelekassiAculops pelekassie0pest
Outcome
excellent results against A. pelekassie0
Direction
excellente0
Comparator
P. oleivorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate) and Shell SD-9129 (3-hydroxy-N-methyl.cis-crotonamide dimethyl phosphate) gave excellent results against A. pelekassi but very poor results against P. oleivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shell SD-9129 gave excellent results against A. pelekassi but poor results against P. oleivora.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
Shell SD-9129e0
Interactor
A. pelekassiAculops pelekassie0pest
Outcome
excellent results against A. pelekassie0
Direction
excellente0
Comparator
P. oleivorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate) and Shell SD-9129 (3-hydroxy-N-methyl.cis-crotonamide dimethyl phosphate) gave excellent results against A. pelekassi but very poor results against P. oleivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nabac was promising against P. oleivora but not strongly toxic to A. pelekassi.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
Nabace0
Interactor
P. oleivoraPhyllocoptruta oleivorae0pest
Outcome
promising against P. oleivorae0
Direction
promisinge0
Comparator
A. pelekassie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phyllocoptruta oleivora
Phyllocoptruta oleivora · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLumass · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nabac (2,2'-methylenebis[3,4,6-trichlorophenol]) was promising against P. oleivora but not strongly toxic to A. pelekassi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑