Abstract
To evaluate the association between AzoFert® and efficient microorganisms (EM) in the morphological and productive response of common bean in three sowing season, three experiments were developed at the Collective farmer "Martires de Taguasco", Sancti Spíritus, Cuba, from September 2014 to April 2015. The treatments evaluated were the absolute Control: without inoculating and without fertilizing, foliar applications of EM (100 mg.L-1), inoculation of the seeds with AzoFert® (108 cfu.g-1) and the associate between AzoFert® + EM. The indicators evaluated were: the height of the plants (cm), the number of leaves per plant, legumes per plant, grains per plant, mass of 100 grains (g) and yield (t.ha-1). The results showed that the treatments with EM, AzoFert® and the association between AzoFert® + EM achieved higher responses of the morphological and productive indicators on the intermediate sowing period (EI) in comparison to early (ET) and late season (EA). The AzoFert® + EM association treatments showed better performance compared with the individual application of EM and AzoFert® also increase the indicators evaluated and the yield was higher ~102 % in early season, ~113 % in the intermediate and 111 % in the late season in relationship to absolute control. The findings established the potentiality of the association of AzoFert® + ME as an efficient alternative to increase bean productivity and could potentially lead to sustained increase in crop yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
EM application gave higher morphological and productive indicators in the intermediate than early or late season.
Verbatim
e0“the treatments with EM, AzoFert® and the association between AzoFert® + EM achieved higher responses of the morphological and productive indicators on the intermediate sowing period (EI) in comparison to early (ET) and late season (EA).”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
AzoFert application gave higher morphological and productive indicators in the intermediate than early or late season.
Verbatim
e0“the treatments with EM, AzoFert® and the association between AzoFert® + EM achieved higher responses of the morphological and productive indicators on the intermediate sowing period (EI) in comparison to early (ET) and late season (EA).”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined AzoFert and EM gave higher morphological and productive indicators in the intermediate than early or late season.
Verbatim
e0“the treatments with EM, AzoFert® and the association between AzoFert® + EM achieved higher responses of the morphological and productive indicators on the intermediate sowing period (EI) in comparison to early (ET) and late season (EA).”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined AzoFert and EM performed better than either application alone across evaluated indicators.
Verbatim
e0“The AzoFert® + EM association treatments showed better performance compared with the individual application of EM and AzoFert® also increase the indicators evaluated”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased early-season yield by about 102% over absolute control.
Verbatim
e0“The AzoFert® + EM association treatments showed better performance compared with the individual application of EM and AzoFert® also increase the indicators evaluated and the yield was higher ~102 % in early season, ~113 % in the intermediate and 111 % in the late season in relationship to absolute control.”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased intermediate-season yield by about 113% over absolute control.
Verbatim
e0“The AzoFert® + EM association treatments showed better performance compared with the individual application of EM and AzoFert® also increase the indicators evaluated and the yield was higher ~102 % in early season, ~113 % in the intermediate and 111 % in the late season in relationship to absolute control.”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment increased late-season yield by 111% over absolute control.
Verbatim
e0“The AzoFert® + EM association treatments showed better performance compared with the individual application of EM and AzoFert® also increase the indicators evaluated and the yield was higher ~102 % in early season, ~113 % in the intermediate and 111 % in the late season in relationship to absolute control.”
t0“beans”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose the combined treatment as an efficient alternative to increase bean productivity.
Verbatim
e0“the association of AzoFert® + ME as an efficient alternative to increase bean productivity”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.