Paper · 2001 · International Journal of Remote Sensing

Spectroscopic determination of wheat water status using 1650-1850 nm spectral absorption features

Q. Tian; Q. Tong; R. Pu; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat leaves were measured radiometrically in order to spectrally characterize the water deficiency symptoms. In this study, a FieldSpec-FR was used for measuring wheat leaf spectra. After the spectral analysis using a spectral normalizing technique, the spectral absorption feature parameters: wavelength position (nm), depth and area (relative value) were extracted from each wheat leaf spectrum. The relative water content (RWC) was measured for each wheat leaf sample. A linear regression analysis was conducted between the spectral absorption feature parameters and corresponding RWCs. The experimental results from 110 samples indicated that reflectance spectra of wheat leaves in the 1650-1850 nm region were dominated by water content. With a decrease in wheat leaf RWC, the 1650-1850 nm spectral absorption features gradually become obvious. The relative errors of predicted RWCs and the absolute error of predicted wavelength positions were calculated from 12 validation samples by established regression equations. The relative errors of predicted RWCs and the absolute error of predicted wavelength position (nm) were both low (<6% for RWCs by the depth and area and <12 nm for the wavelength position, respectively). Furthermore, we discuss the potential and limitations of spectroscopic determination of wheat RWC by using remote sensing technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water content dominated wheat leaf reflectance spectra in the 1650-1850 nm region.

Outcome
reflectance spectra of wheat leavese0
Qualifier
dominated by water contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reflectance spectra of wheat leaves in the 1650-1850 nm region were dominated by water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–743 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1650-1850 nm absorption features became more obvious as wheat leaf relative water content fell.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
1650-1850 nm spectral absorption featurese0
Direction
become obviouse0
Qualifier
decrease in wheat leaf RWCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a decrease in wheat leaf RWC, the 1650-1850 nm spectral absorption features gradually become obvious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–850 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depth and area features predicted wheat leaf relative water content with relative errors below 6%.

Outcome
relative errors of predicted RWCse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
<6%e0
Qualifier
by the depth and areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative errors of predicted RWCs and the absolute error of predicted wavelength position (nm) were both low (<6% for RWCs by the depth and area and <12 nm for the wavelength position, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted wavelength positions had absolute errors below 12 nm.

Outcome
absolute error of predicted wavelength position (nm)e0
Direction
lowe0
Value
<12 nme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative errors of predicted RWCs and the absolute error of predicted wavelength position (nm) were both low (<6% for RWCs by the depth and area and <12 nm for the wavelength position, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑