Paper · 2022 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

Effect of the solar energy evaporative cooling and reducing the cover permeability on the production and quality of greenhouse cucumber

Mohamed Omar; Abdellateif Samak; Said Elsisi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Climate change has become one of the most important factors affecting in agricultural production, the impact on our global food supply. We must expand our focus to avoid its effect on the crop’s productivity. Environmental control inside greenhouse can be used to avoid the impact of different environmental changes. This work studies the effectiveness of greenhouse cooling by the solar energy -assisted evaporation concerted with painting its cover by influential coating material on the cucumber productivity and quality. To achieve this goal, the work was divided into two main experiments. The first one was the preliminary experiment; it was carried to choose the strong and effective parameters of treated coating materials which prevent the maximum value of solar radiation. The second one was the field experiment to validate the preliminary experiment integrated with solar-assisted evaporative cooling system for greenhouse cooling. The field experiment was done to assess both of the cucumber yield and quality under treated with control greenhouses. From the preliminary experiment, results showed that painting the cover using the selected material achieved the least transmission coefficient (0.59) and the lowest temperature (31.6 oC). Painting the greenhouse cover alongside evaporative cooling system which consumed 8.32 MJ day-1 attained from solar system (PV) decreased the temperature about 10 degrees. The yield increased by 11 %. The cucumber weight losses with control greenhouse increased by 21.6% compared with the treated greenhouse. This system can be applied to refrigerate most facilities with great efficiency to maximize the productivity and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the preliminary experiment, painting the greenhouse cover with the selected material gave the least transmission coefficient, 0.59.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
painting the cover using the selected materiale1
Outcome
transmission coefficiente1
Direction
leaste1
Value
0.59e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“painting the cover using the selected material achieved the least transmission coefficient (0.59) and the lowest temperature (31.6 oC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the preliminary experiment, painting the greenhouse cover with the selected material gave the lowest temperature, 31.6 oC.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
painting the cover using the selected materiale1
Outcome
temperaturee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
31.6 oCe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“painting the cover using the selected material achieved the least transmission coefficient (0.59) and the lowest temperature (31.6 oC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Painting the greenhouse cover together with solar (PV) powered evaporative cooling consuming 8.32 MJ day-1 decreased the temperature by about 10 degrees.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Painting the greenhouse cover alongside evaporative cooling systeme1
Outcome
temperaturee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
about 10 degreese1
Qualifier
8.32 MJ day-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Painting the greenhouse cover alongside evaporative cooling system which consumed 8.32 MJ day-1 attained from solar system (PV) decreased the temperature about 10 degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield increased by 11% in the treated greenhouse.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Painting the greenhouse cover alongside evaporative cooling systeme2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield increased by 11 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1451 · show in text ↑
e2

“Painting the greenhouse cover alongside evaporative cooling system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber weight losses in the control greenhouse were 21.6% higher than in the treated greenhouse.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
the treated greenhousee1
Outcome
cucumber weight lossese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.6%e1
Comparator
control greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cucumber weight losses with control greenhouse increased by 21.6% compared with the treated greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1559 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the system can be applied to refrigerate most facilities with great efficiency.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
applied to refrigerate most facilities with great efficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This system can be applied to refrigerate most facilities with great efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑

processing · soil: physics · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.