Paper · 2022 · Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology

Weed control and cowpea yield under different tillage systems

Francis Nwagwu; Manthy Athanasius; Goddey Michael; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field studies conducted in 2016 and 2017 in Calabar, Nigeria, evaluated the influence of tillage methods on weed control and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp). These were split-plot experiments laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications; involving no-tillage, plough + harrow, hoe tillage and SAMPEA 11, SAMPEA 12 and "Kanannado" cowpea varieties. Analysis of variance indicated significant (P 0.05) tillage, cowpea varieties and their interaction effects on weed control and yields of cowpea. Tillage system did not change the soil texture. The results obtained could not be attributed to environmental changes as the weather data for the 2 years were not unique, rather they followed a similar trend. Longer pods with the highest number of pods plant -1 , seeds pod -1 , and seed yield (kg) ha -1 of cowpea were produced in ploughed plus harrowed plots. "Kanannado" reduced weed dry matter by 50.32% and 49.39% over SAMPEA 12 and SAMPEA 11, respectively. "Kanannado" combined with no-tillage (92.00 kg ha -1 ) was similar (P > 0.05) to SAMPEA 11 combined with notillage (101.50 kg ha -1 ). However, the combination of SAMPEA 12 with ploughing and harrowing produced the highest seed yield (667.00 kg ha -1 ) and was recommended for adoption based on outstanding yield and satisfactory weed control in cowpea production in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage, cowpea variety, and their interaction significantly affected weed control and yields.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
weed control and yields of cowpeae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P 0.05) tillage, cowpea varieties and their interaction effects on weed control and yields of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage system did not change soil texture.

Treatment
Tillage systeme0
Outcome
soil texturee0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage system did not change the soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing and harrowing produced longer cowpea pods.

Treatment
ploughed plus harrowed plotse0
Outcome
podse0
Direction
Longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer pods with the highest number of pods plant -1 , seeds pod -1 , and seed yield (kg) ha -1 of cowpea were produced in ploughed plus harrowed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing and harrowing produced the highest pods per plant and seeds per pod.

Treatment
ploughed plus harrowed plotse0
Outcome
number of pods plant -1 , seeds pod -1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer pods with the highest number of pods plant -1 , seeds pod -1 , and seed yield (kg) ha -1 of cowpea were produced in ploughed plus harrowed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing and harrowing produced the highest cowpea seed yield.

Treatment
ploughed plus harrowed plotse0
Outcome
seed yield (kg) ha -1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (kg) ha -1 of cowpea were produced in ploughed plus harrowed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanannado reduced weed dry matter by 50.32% versus SAMPEA 12.

Material
Kanannadoe0
Treatment
Kanannadoe0
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50.32%e0
Comparator
SAMPEA 12e0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“"Kanannado" reduced weed dry matter by 50.32% and 49.39% over SAMPEA 12 and SAMPEA 11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanannado reduced weed dry matter by 49.39% versus SAMPEA 11.

Material
Kanannadoe0
Treatment
Kanannadoe0
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
49.39%e0
Comparator
SAMPEA 11e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“"Kanannado" reduced weed dry matter by 50.32% and 49.39% over SAMPEA 12 and SAMPEA 11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanannado with no-tillage yielded 92.00 kg ha -1, statistically similar to SAMPEA 11 with no-tillage at 101.50 kg ha -1.

Material
Kanannadoe0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Kanannadoe0
Direction
similare0
Value
92.00 kg ha -1e0
Qualifier
101.50 kg ha -1e0
Comparator
SAMPEA 11e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“"Kanannado" combined with no-tillage (92.00 kg ha -1 ) was similar (P > 0.05) to SAMPEA 11 combined with notillage (101.50 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SAMPEA 12 with ploughing and harrowing gave the highest seed yield, 667.00 kg ha -1.

Material
SAMPEA 12e0
Treatment
ploughing and harrowinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
667.00 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of SAMPEA 12 with ploughing and harrowing produced the highest seed yield (667.00 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1249 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend SAMPEA 12 with ploughing and harrowing for adoption.

Outcome
recommended for adoptione0
Qualifier
outstanding yield and satisfactory weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was recommended for adoption based on outstanding yield and satisfactory weed control in cowpea production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1378 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.