Paper · 2022 · Plants

Optimization of Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass in Terms of Forage Yield and Quality Traits

Poe Thinzar Bo; Yongli Dong; Ruifang Zhang; et al.

16
claims
21
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Forage has a significant association with animal nutrition because it is an essential part of milk and meat production in the livestock industry. Thus, for the production of high-quality forage, cereal-legume mixed cropping is an efficient method for meat and milk production in the livestock sector. In a two-year experiment between 2020 and 2021, the forage yield, nutritional compositions, amino acid profile, and forage quality were evaluated in the mixed cropping of winter wheat and ryegrass with alfalfa. In this study, a split-plot design with a randomized block design was employed with three sampling replicates. Cultivars were harvested at three maturity stages, namely, flowering, milk, and soft dough, depending on the wheat growth stage. The experimental results show that wheat 2 (Baomai 9)-alfalfa and ryegrass-alfalfa mixed cropping produced higher fresh biomass output than mono-cropping of wheat and ryegrass harvested at the flowering stage. Furthermore, the dry matter (DM) percentage range increased from 20.18% to 36.39%. By contrast, crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were higher at the flowering stage than at other harvesting stages with DM values of 14.28%, 34.12%, 55.06%, and 32.55%, respectively. Ryegrass-alfalfa mixing yielded higher values of mineral compositions, and T5 (Baomai 9-alfalfa) generally achieved more extraordinary amino acid compositions. The results demonstrate that wheat and ryegrass with alfalfa mixed cropping, and harvesting at the flowering period produces high-quality forage. Additionally, mixed cropping with alfalfa remarkably affected forage quality parameters, while mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively. Thus, the mixed-cropping of wheat and ryegrass with alfalfa forage is recommended for its maximized quality forage production and nutritional values in livestock feedstuff.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 wheat with alfalfa produced more fresh biomass than monocropped wheat at flowering.

Material
Baomai 9e0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
wheat 2 (Baomai 9)-alfalfae0
Outcome
fresh biomass outpute0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mono-cropping of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat 2 (Baomai 9)-alfalfa and ryegrass-alfalfa mixed cropping produced higher fresh biomass output than mono-cropping of wheat and ryegrass harvested at the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass with alfalfa produced more fresh biomass than monocropped ryegrass at flowering.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
ryegrass-alfalfa mixed croppinge0
Outcome
fresh biomass outpute0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mono-cropping of wheat and ryegrasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat 2 (Baomai 9)-alfalfa and ryegrass-alfalfa mixed cropping produced higher fresh biomass output than mono-cropping of wheat and ryegrass harvested at the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter percentage increased from 20.18% to 36.39%.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
dry matter (DM) percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.18% to 36.39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter (DM) percentage range increased from 20.18% to 36.39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein was higher at flowering than other harvest stages, at 14.28% DM.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.28%e0
Comparator
other harvesting stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were higher at the flowering stage than at other harvesting stages with DM values of 14.28%, 34.12%, 55.06%, and 32.55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fiber was higher at flowering, at 34.12% DM.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
crude fibere0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.12%e0
Comparator
other harvesting stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were higher at the flowering stage than at other harvesting stages with DM values of 14.28%, 34.12%, 55.06%, and 32.55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber was higher at flowering, at 55.06% DM.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
neutral detergent fibere0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.06%e0
Comparator
other harvesting stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were higher at the flowering stage than at other harvesting stages with DM values of 14.28%, 34.12%, 55.06%, and 32.55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid detergent fiber was higher at flowering, at 32.55% DM.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
acid detergent fibere0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.55%e0
Comparator
other harvesting stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were higher at the flowering stage than at other harvesting stages with DM values of 14.28%, 34.12%, 55.06%, and 32.55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass and alfalfa mixing yielded higher mineral composition values.

Taxon
RyegrassLoliume0
Treatment
Ryegrass-alfalfa mixinge0
Outcome
mineral compositionse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ryegrass-alfalfa mixing yielded higher values of mineral compositions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had greater amino acid composition.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
amino acid compositionse0
Direction
more extraordinarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 (Baomai 9-alfalfa) generally achieved more extraordinary amino acid compositions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest dry matter intake, 2.56.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
dry matter intakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.56e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest digestible dry matter, 68.54.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
digestible dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
68.54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest relative feed value, 136.49.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
relative feed valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
136.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest total digestible nutrient, 60.50.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
total digestible nutriente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest relative forage quality, 127.41.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
relative forage qualitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
127.41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baomai 9 with alfalfa had the highest quality index, 1.69.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
Baomai 9e0
Outcome
quality indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.69e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of wheat cultivar 2 (Baomai 9) and alfalfa obtained the highest dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, relative feed value, total digestible nutrient, relative forage quality, and quality index values of 2.56, 68.54, 136.49, 60.50, 127.41, and 1.69, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1952 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wheat and ryegrass mixed with alfalfa for high quality forage.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
mixed-cropping of wheat and ryegrass with alfalfa foragee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed-cropping of wheat and ryegrass with alfalfa forage is recommended for its maximized quality forage production and nutritional values in livestock feedstuff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2125 · show in text ↑

Medicago sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 27 positive, 11 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

intercropping · yield · LoliumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.