Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Assessing varietal tolerance and weed control effectiveness of metribuzin-based herbicide mixtures in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

SARITA RANI; SURESH KUMAR; V S HOODA; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2014–15 and 2015–16 at Research Farm of Department of Agronomy,CCSHAU, Hisar. The experiment comprised five wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties (WH 1105, HD 2967, DPW621-50, WH 1124 and DBW 17) in main plots and six weed management practices, viz. metribuzin (210 g/ha),metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha), metribuzin + pinoxaden (150 + 40 g/ha), metribuzin + clodinafop (150+ 45 g/ha), weed free and weedy check in sub-plots was conducted in split-plot design with three replications. Thepopulation and dry matter accumulation of weeds were not affected by wheat varieties. Wheat variety WH 1105resulted in maximum grain yield and remained at par with HD 2967 and DPW 621-50, but statistically superior toDBW 17 and WH 1124. Minimum population of grassy and total weeds and dry matter accumulation by them wasobserved with metribuzin + fenoxaprop, being at par with other two combinations of metribuzin. But, the densityand dry matter of broad leaved weeds was minimum with metribuzin alone (210 g/ha). Among herbicidal treatments, metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha) remained superior with maximum grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The population and dry matter accumulation of weeds were not affected by wheat variety.

Treatment
wheat varietiese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry matter accumulation of weedse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thepopulation and dry matter accumulation of weeds were not affected by wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat variety WH 1105 gave the maximum grain yield, at par with HD 2967 and DPW 621-50 and statistically superior to DBW 17 and WH 1124.

Material
WH 1105e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
DBW 17 and WH 1124e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wheat variety WH 1105resulted in maximum grain yield and remained at par with HD 2967 and DPW 621-50, but statistically superior toDBW 17 and WH 1124”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin + fenoxaprop gave the minimum population of grassy and total weeds and their dry matter accumulation, at par with the other two metribuzin combinations.

Treatment
metribuzin + fenoxaprope0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population of grassy and total weeds and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum population of grassy and total weeds and dry matter accumulation by them wasobserved with metribuzin + fenoxaprop, being at par with other two combinations of metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin alone (210 g/ha) gave the minimum density and dry matter of broad leaved weeds.

Treatment
metribuzin alone (210 g/ha)e0
Interactor
broad leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter of broad leaved weedse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“dry matter of broad leaved weeds was minimum with metribuzin alone (210 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among herbicidal treatments, metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha) remained superior with the maximum grain yield.

Treatment
metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“metribuzin + fenoxaprop (150 + 100 g/ha) remained superior with maximum grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1164 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.