Paper · 2022 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

THE EFFECT OF SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE ENRICHED WITH SELENIUM AND ZINC ON THE YIELD AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PARAMETERS OF LETTUCE (Lactuca sativa L.)

Tomasz Spiżewski; Włodzimierz Krzesiński; Alina Kałużewicz; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of Agaricus bisporus spent mushroom substrate (A-SMS) enriched with selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn) on the yield and photosynthetic parameters of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata) of the ‘Skindel’ cultivar. The growing medium for the cultivation of lettuce consisted of A-SMS (10%) and commercial peat (90%). It was further enriched with Se and Zn concentrated at five levels, i.e. 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mmol·L–1 to obtain six growing medias. Se was added to the growing medium in the form of sodium selenite and sodium selenate at a 1:1 ratio, whereas Zn was added in the form of zinc nitrate hexahydrate. Lettuce was grown under controlled conditions in growth chambers. The experiment was conducted in a randomised complete block design in three replicates. The results indicated that the A-SMS added to the growing medium increased both the yield of lettuce and its biological value by increasing the content of Se and Zn. Consumable percent recommended daily allowance and safe hazard quotient for lettuce biofortified with Se and Zn were achieved. The experiment also showed that the addition of Se + Zn did not negatively affect photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, which proved that these elements did not have toxic effect on lettuce in agronomic perspective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding A-SMS to the medium increased lettuce yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
A-SMS added to the growing mediume0
Outcome
yield of lettucee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the A-SMS added to the growing medium increased both the yield of lettuce and its biological value by increasing the content of Se and Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding A-SMS increased Se and Zn content in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
A-SMS added to the growing mediume0
Outcome
content of Se and Zne0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the A-SMS added to the growing medium increased both the yield of lettuce and its biological value by increasing the content of Se and Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortified lettuce achieved the stated recommended daily allowance and safe hazard quotient criteria.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
Consumable percent recommended daily allowance and safe hazard quotiente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consumable percent recommended daily allowance and safe hazard quotient for lettuce biofortified with Se and Zn were achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Se and Zn did not negatively affect photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
addition of Se + Zne0
Outcome
photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameterse0
Direction
did not negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of Se + Zn did not negatively affect photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–124 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

growing medium · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.