Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition

Effect of time of sowing, seed rate, and cultivar on oat green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yield

B. Murali; R. Susheela; M. Shanti; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find out suitable sowing time, optimum seed rate, and right cultivar of fodder oat for Telangana. The treatments consisted of 16 combinations with four times of sowing (first fortnight of October, second fortnight of October, first fortnight of November, and second fortnight of November), two seed rates (80 and 100 kg/ha), and two fodder oat cultivars (JHO 822 and Kent). The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design and replicated thrice in sandy loam soil. Two-year (2016–17 & 2017–18) pooled data analysis results revealed that green fodder yield, dry matter yield, and crude protein yields recorded were significantly (p<0.05) higher with the crop sown during the first fortnight of November followed by the second fortnight of October. Plant height and tiller number per meter row length also responded similarly. No significant difference was observed among the two seed rates for plant height, the number of tillers/meter row, green, and dry fodder yields except crude protein where 100 kg/ha seed rate recorded higher crude protein yield than 80 kg/ha seed rate. Cultivars significantly differed in plant height and crude protein yield only. All the interaction effects were found to be non-significant. The best sowing window for obtaining higher fodder yield and quality of oat in Telangana was found to be from the second fortnight of October to the first fortnight of November.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early November sowing significantly raised green fodder, dry matter and crude protein yields versus late October.

Treatment
first fortnight of Novembere0
Outcome
green fodder yield, dry matter yield, and crude protein yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
second fortnight of Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green fodder yield, dry matter yield, and crude protein yields recorded were significantly (p<0.05) higher with the crop sown during the first fortnight of November followed by the second fortnight of October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early November sowing similarly increased plant height and tiller number.

Outcome
Plant height and tiller number per meter row lengthe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and tiller number per meter row length also responded similarly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two seed rates did not differ significantly for plant height, tillers, or green and dry fodder yields.

Treatment
two seed ratese0
Outcome
plant height, the number of tillers/meter row, green, and dry fodder yieldse0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Comparator
two seed ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference was observed among the two seed rates for plant height, the number of tillers/meter row, green, and dry fodder yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 kg/ha seed rate gave higher crude protein yield than 80 kg/ha.

Treatment
100 kg/ha seed ratee0
Outcome
crude protein yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
80 kg/ha seed ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 kg/ha seed rate recorded higher crude protein yield than 80 kg/ha seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in plant height and crude protein yield.

Material
Cultivarse0
Outcome
plant height and crude protein yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars significantly differed in plant height and crude protein yield only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All interactions were nonsignificant.

Outcome
interaction effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the interaction effects were found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified late October through early November as the best sowing window for oat fodder yield and quality in Telangana.

Outcome
best sowing windowe0
Qualifier
from the second fortnight of October to the first fortnight of Novembere0
Setting
Telanganae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best sowing window for obtaining higher fodder yield and quality of oat in Telangana was found to be from the second fortnight of October to the first fortnight of November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1433 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 29 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

density · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.