Paper · 2022 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Water Consumption, Growth, Yield and Water Productivity for Pepper Plant

N Ichwan; F S Meliala; M F Ezra; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Irrigation is a costly activity, where the amount of water should be given as much as required. Pepper plant is a horticulture plant that literally needs water, and one of methods could be used the field capacity (FC) water content method as set point to watering pepper plant. The study aimed to determine peppers’ water consumption, to describe pepper growth and yield, and lastly to determine pepper’ water productivity. The result of the study showed that the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively. Secondly, plant height in FC was higher than the others treatment, the average of yield were 52.49 g, 42.35 g, and 29.23 g, respectively. Lastly, water productivity were 0.054 g/ml, 0.042 g/ml, and 0.008 g/ml, respectively. The conclusion of the study were pepper water consumption for FC higher than the others, however water productivity for FC and 75%FC were closely, furthermore, 50%FC not recommended to be implemented for pepper cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at field capacity had a water consumption rate of 151 ml/day.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FCe1
Outcome
water consumption ratee1
Value
151 ml/daye1

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 75% field capacity had a water consumption rate of 117 ml/day.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
75% FCe1
Outcome
water consumption ratee1
Value
117 ml/daye1

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 50% field capacity had a water consumption rate of 93.4 ml/day.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
50% FCe1
Outcome
water consumption ratee1
Value
93.4 ml/daye1

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper plant height at field capacity was higher than under the other treatments.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FCe3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
the others treatmente3

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“plant height in FC was higher than the others treatment, the average of yield were 52.49 g, 42.35 g, and 29.23 g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at field capacity had an average yield of 52.49 g.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FCe3
Outcome
average of yielde3
Value
52.49 ge3

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“plant height in FC was higher than the others treatment, the average of yield were 52.49 g, 42.35 g, and 29.23 g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 75% field capacity had an average yield of 42.35 g.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
75% FCe1
Outcome
average of yielde3
Value
42.35 ge3

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
e3

“plant height in FC was higher than the others treatment, the average of yield were 52.49 g, 42.35 g, and 29.23 g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 50% field capacity had an average yield of 29.23 g.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
50% FCe1
Outcome
average of yielde3
Value
29.23 ge3

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
e3

“plant height in FC was higher than the others treatment, the average of yield were 52.49 g, 42.35 g, and 29.23 g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at field capacity had water productivity of 0.054 g/ml.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FCe1
Outcome
water productivitye4
Value
0.054 g/mle4

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
e4

“water productivity were 0.054 g/ml, 0.042 g/ml, and 0.008 g/ml, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 75% field capacity had water productivity of 0.042 g/ml.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
75% FCe1
Outcome
water productivitye4
Value
0.042 g/mle4

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
e4

“water productivity were 0.054 g/ml, 0.042 g/ml, and 0.008 g/ml, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper at 50% field capacity had water productivity of 0.008 g/ml.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
50% FCe1
Outcome
water productivitye4
Value
0.008 g/mle4

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pepper water consumption rate for FC, 75% FC, and 50% FC were 151 ml/day; 117 ml/day, and 93.4 ml/day, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–588 · show in text ↑
e4

“water productivity were 0.054 g/ml, 0.042 g/ml, and 0.008 g/ml, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper water consumption at field capacity was higher than under the other treatments.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FCe5
Outcome
water consumptione5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
the otherse5

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“pepper water consumption for FC higher than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity at field capacity and 75% field capacity was close.

Taxon
Pepper Plantt0
Treatment
FC and 75%FCe6
Outcome
water productivitye6
Direction
closelye6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“water productivity for FC and 75%FC were closely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–959 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend 50% field capacity irrigation for pepper cultivation.

Taxon
peppere7
Outcome
50%FCe7

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“50%FC not recommended to be implemented for pepper cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1036 · show in text ↑