Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen efficiency indexes association with nitrogen recovery, utilization, and use efficiency in spring barley at various nitrogen application rates

Mohamed Abdelaal Ali; Abdelhalim I. Ghazy; Khaled D. Alotaibi; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is the ratio of the N uptake by the plant to the total amount of applied N fertilizer. The optimization of NUE is essential for sustainable agriculture, especially in the breeding programs to improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.). We investigated the NUE variation in 32 barley genotypes and to examine the response relationship between phenotypic traits and N level to determine the traits essential for the selection of breeding programs to optimize the NUE. The NUE was investigated in 32 barley genotypes for 2 yr under field conditions using three N levels (60, 120, and 180 kg N ha −1 ). Growth, physiological and agronomic traits, and N efficiency‐related parameters were determined. The parameters investigated were significantly affected by N application and its interactions with traits. Plant height, biological yield, spike length, and grain number (GN) were increased at higher N levels, but the 1,000‐grain weight decreased. The lowest grain yield was 2,000.7 kg ha −1 at 60 kg N ha −1 , and the highest was 8,607.9 kg ha −1 at 120 kg N ha −1 . An increase in the N rate from 60 to 120 kg N ha −1 was associated with a higher total chlorophyll content (CHL SPAD ) (from 19.04 to 23.13), but no significant change in CHL was seen at 180 kg N ha −1 . The agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE), fertilizer N recovery efficiency and the nitrogen utilization efficiency were both reduced with an increase of the N application rate. A path analysis revealed that GN was the most essential trait for NUE breeding program selection due to its high direct effect (0.72) on ANUE. A linear discriminant analysis showed that CHL at 60 d after sowing was the best trait for distinguishing low from high N levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, biological yield and spike length increased at higher N levels in barley.

Treatment
higher N levelse3
Outcome
Plant height, biological yield, spike lengthe3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“The NUE was investigated in 32 barley genotypes for 2 yr under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–595 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant height, biological yield, spike length, and grain number (GN) were increased at higher N levels, but the 1,000‐grain weight decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number increased at higher N levels in barley.

Treatment
higher N levelse3
Outcome
grain number (GN)e3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant height, biological yield, spike length, and grain number (GN) were increased at higher N levels, but the 1,000‐grain weight decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1,000‐grain weight decreased at higher N levels in barley.

Treatment
higher N levelse3
Outcome
1,000‐grain weighte3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant height, biological yield, spike length, and grain number (GN) were increased at higher N levels, but the 1,000‐grain weight decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest barley grain yield was 2,000.7 kg ha −1 at 60 kg N ha −1.

Outcome
lowest grain yielde4
Value
2,000.7 kg ha −1e4
Qualifier
at 60 kg N ha −1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest grain yield was 2,000.7 kg ha −1 at 60 kg N ha −1 , and the highest was 8,607.9 kg ha −1 at 120 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest barley grain yield was 8,607.9 kg ha −1 at 120 kg N ha −1.

Outcome
grain yielde4
Value
8,607.9 kg ha −1e4
Qualifier
at 120 kg N ha −1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest grain yield was 2,000.7 kg ha −1 at 60 kg N ha −1 , and the highest was 8,607.9 kg ha −1 at 120 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in N rate from 60 to 120 kg N ha −1 was associated with higher total chlorophyll content in barley.

Treatment
An increase in the N rate from 60 to 120 kg N ha −1e5
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente5
Direction
highere5
Value
from 19.04 to 23.13e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e5

“An increase in the N rate from 60 to 120 kg N ha −1 was associated with a higher total chlorophyll content (CHL SPAD ) (from 19.04 to 23.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1254 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content showed no significant change at 180 kg N ha −1 in barley.

Treatment
180 kg N ha −1e6
Outcome
CHLe6
Direction
no significant changee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e6

“but no significant change in CHL was seen at 180 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agronomic nitrogen use efficiency, fertilizer N recovery efficiency and nitrogen utilization efficiency of barley were reduced with an increase of the N application rate.

Treatment
an increase of the N application ratee7
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE), fertilizer N recovery efficiency and the nitrogen utilization efficiencye7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e7

“The agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE), fertilizer N recovery efficiency and the nitrogen utilization efficiency were both reduced with an increase of the N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number was the most essential trait for NUE breeding selection in barley, with a direct effect of 0.72 on ANUE.

Outcome
ANUEe7
Value
0.72e7
Qualifier
GN was the most essential trait for NUE breeding program selectione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e7

“GN was the most essential trait for NUE breeding program selection due to its high direct effect (0.72) on ANUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CHL at 60 days after sowing was the best trait for distinguishing low from high N levels in barley.

Outcome
CHL at 60 d after sowinge7
Qualifier
the best trait for distinguishing low from high N levelse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e7

“CHL at 60 d after sowing was the best trait for distinguishing low from high N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley growth, physiological and agronomic parameters were significantly affected by N application.

Treatment
N applicatione2
Outcome
parameters investigatede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improve the yield of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e2

“The parameters investigated were significantly affected by N application and its interactions with traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–851 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.