Abstract
In Uzbekistan, there is a demand of the population for fresh melon fruits during the off-season. In the Research Institute of Vegetable, Melon Crops and Potato for the first time studies were carried out, when grown in a greenhouse, on the vegetative grafting of melon’s Zarkhal variety on the vegetable marrow varieties used as rootstocks. The aim of the research was to study the effect of vegetable marrow rootstocks on the variability of economically valuable traits of the Zarkhal melon variety and to identify promising combinations of vegetable marrow rootstocks that increase the yield and quality of melon fruits. Methods . The studies were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the World Vegetable Center. As a control, ungrafted plants of the Zarkhal melon variety were used. For comparison with the control, plants of this variety were grafted onto their own plants. Also, plants of the melon variety Zarkhal (scion) were grafted in combinations on 10 varieties of vegetable marrow, which served as rootstocks. Vegetative grafting of melon on vegetable marrow rootstocks was carried out “in a split” in the phase of the first true leaf when the stem diameter reached 4.1–4.3 mm and plant height 4.4–5.9 cm. Results . In comparison with the control, in combinations of grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow, the flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formation was observed 2 days earlier. In the same combinations, fruit ripening was observed on 81-82 days, which is 4-5 days earlier than the control (86 days). They also had the tallest plants (203-205 cm), the plants formed 2-4 leaves more than the others. Marketable yields between combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2 . The melon variety Zarkhal, grafted onto its own plants, lagged behind the control in all phases of development and yield. The early yield in combinations was from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2 and amounted to 53-59% of the yield. The average fruit weight varied from 785 to 810 g.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting Zarkhal melon onto Grecheskiye 110 advanced flowering and fruit formation by two days relative to ungrafted plants.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe0 - Material
- Zarkhale0
- Treatment
- grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110e0
- Outcome
- flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formatione0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 2 dayse0
- Comparator
- ungrafted plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“in combinations of grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow, the flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formation was observed 2 days earlier.”
e1“As a control, ungrafted plants of the Zarkhal melon variety were used.”
Claim · model-written summary
The same named rootstock combinations ripened fruit on days 81–82, four to five days earlier than controls.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe1 - Treatment
- grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
- Outcome
- fruit ripeninge0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 4-5 dayse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In the same combinations, fruit ripening was observed on 81-82 days, which is 4-5 days earlier than the control (86 days).”
e1“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”
Claim · model-written summary
The named graft combinations produced the tallest plants, at 203–205 cm.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe1 - Treatment
- grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
- Outcome
- tallest plantse0
- Direction
- talleste0
- Value
- 203-205 cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“They also had the tallest plants (203-205 cm)”
e1“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”
Claim · model-written summary
The named graft combinations formed two to four more leaves than other plants.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe1 - Treatment
- grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
- Outcome
- leavese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 2-4 leavese0
- Comparator
- the otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the plants formed 2-4 leaves more than the others”
e1“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield across graft combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis melot0 - Outcome
- Marketable yieldse0
- Value
- 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Marketable yields between combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2”
t0“melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Self-grafted Zarkhal melon lagged behind ungrafted controls in every developmental phase and yield.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe0 - Material
- Zarkhale0
- Treatment
- grafted onto its own plantse0
- Outcome
- all phases of development and yielde0
- Direction
- lagged behinde0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The melon variety Zarkhal, grafted onto its own plants, lagged behind the control in all phases of development and yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Early yield across combinations ranged from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis melot0 - Outcome
- early yielde0
- Value
- 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The early yield in combinations was from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2”
t0“melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Early yield comprised 53–59% of total yield.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis melot0 - Outcome
- early yielde1
- Value
- 53-59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“amounted to 53-59% of the yield”
e1“The early yield in combinations”
t0“melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Average fruit weight ranged from 785 to 810 g.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis melot0 - Outcome
- average fruit weighte0
- Value
- 785 to 810 ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The average fruit weight varied from 785 to 810 g.”
t0“melon”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.