Paper · 2015 · Acta Horticulturae

YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF GRAFTED AND NON-GRAFTED MUSKMELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.) AFFECTED BY PLANTING DENSITY

H. Mohammadi; R. Salehi; M. Esmaeili

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of grafted melons for reducing damages caused by soil-borne pathogens is launching in Iran. The price of a grafted transplant is approximately seven times higher than that of a non- grafted one, and thus growers have to carefully consider the economic benefits of using grafted plants, which depend on expected yield and income. Yield and quality of muskmelon cultivar Samsoori (Falat seed company) grafted on rootstock of Cucurbita maxima Duchesne A— Cucurbita moschata Duchesne (‘Ace’; DongBu HighTek seed company) were evaluated in open filed conditions. Experiment had six treatments, two of which with non-grafted and grafted plants with plant densities of 13,333, 8,333, and 6,060 plants/ha. The use of muskmelon grafted on ‘Ace’ rootstock showed significant difference in the total fruit weight and the total yield. Grafting increased total yield about 23.5% with increasing of fruit number per plant. With the use of melon plants, planting density may be reduced by 55%, obtaining lower yields than those obtained from plants grown on common density. Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher flesh and skin percentage than those harvested from non-grafted plants, without affecting the content of soluble solids. Stem length of scions in grafted plants was higher than in the non-grafted ones. Interaction effects of treatments were significantly in traits leaf number and flesh dry matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased total muskmelon yield by about 23.5%.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased total yield about 23.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit number per plant.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
fruit number per plante0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased total yield about 23.5% with increasing of fruit number per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing planting density by 55% gave lower yields than common density.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
planting density may be reduced by 55%e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
55%e0
Comparator
common densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting density may be reduced by 55%, obtaining lower yields than those obtained from plants grown on common density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted fruit had higher flesh percentage than nongrafted fruit.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
fleshe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher flesh and skin percentage than those harvested from non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted fruit had higher skin percentage than nongrafted fruit.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
skin percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher flesh and skin percentage than those harvested from non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not affect soluble solids content.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
content of soluble solidse0
Direction
without affectinge0
Comparator
non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits harvested from grafted plants had higher flesh and skin percentage than those harvested from non-grafted plants, without affecting the content of soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion stems were longer in grafted than nongrafted plants.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
Stem length of scionse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-grafted onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem length of scions in grafted plants was higher than in the non-grafted ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment interaction significantly affected leaf number.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf numbere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of treatments were significantly in traits leaf number and flesh dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment interaction significantly affected flesh dry matter.

Taxon
MUSKMELONCucumis melot0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
flesh dry mattere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of treatments were significantly in traits leaf number and flesh dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.