Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Microclimate Modification on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet

K. J. D. Karthika; V. Manivannan; Ga. Dheebakaran; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Agro Climate Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during the summer 2022 to study the effect of microclimate modification on growth and yield of pearl millet (CO 10). Experiment was laid in Factorized Random Block Design (FRBD) with three factors viz., three levels of land configurations, two levels of mulching and two levels of water stress conditions. Totally 12 treatment combinations that replicated thrice. The results revealed that the paired row with intercropping approach produced the best growth parameters, such as plant height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield followed by paired row sowing and normal sowing due to higher solar radiation interception and utilization. In terms of irrigation level, maximum growth and yield parameters were observed with 0.75 IW/CPE ratio as compared to 0.5 IW/CPE due to lesser canopy temperature. In respect of mulch treatments, the mulched plots under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurations had higher DMP and yield by reducing soil moisture stress, lowering the canopy temperature and higher PAR use efficiency It is concluded that the microclimatic alterations through changes in land configuration, irrigation and mulch application showed an effective adaptive strategy to mitigate adverse weather susceptibility and climatic risks in field crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows with intercropping gave the best pearl millet plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation, followed by paired rows and normal sowing.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
paired row with intercropping approache0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
higher solar radiation interception and utilizatione0
Comparator
paired row sowing and normal sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the paired row with intercropping approach produced the best growth parameters, such as plant height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield followed by paired row sowing and normal sowing due to higher solar radiation interception and utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows with intercropping produced the best pearl millet yield, followed by paired rows and normal sowing.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
paired row with intercropping approache0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
paired row sowing and normal sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the paired row with intercropping approach produced the best growth parameters, such as plant height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and yield followed by paired row sowing and normal sowing due to higher solar radiation interception and utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.75 IW/CPE irrigation ratio gave maximum pearl millet growth and yield versus 0.5 IW/CPE.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
0.75 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
lesser canopy temperaturee0
Comparator
0.5 IW/CPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum growth and yield parameters were observed with 0.75 IW/CPE ratio as compared to 0.5 IW/CPE due to lesser canopy temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased pearl millet dry matter production and yield across irrigation and land configurations.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulched plotse0
Outcome
DMP and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mulched plots under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurations had higher DMP and yield by reducing soil moisture stress, lowering the canopy temperature and higher PAR use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching reduced soil moisture stress in pearl millet plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulched plotse0
Outcome
soil moisture stresse0
Direction
reducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mulched plots under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurations had higher DMP and yield by reducing soil moisture stress, lowering the canopy temperature and higher PAR use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching lowered pearl millet canopy temperature.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulched plotse0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Direction
loweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mulched plots under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurations had higher DMP and yield by reducing soil moisture stress, lowering the canopy temperature and higher PAR use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved pearl millet PAR use efficiency.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulched plotse0
Outcome
PAR use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mulched plots under both the levels of irrigation and at different land configurations had higher DMP and yield by reducing soil moisture stress, lowering the canopy temperature and higher PAR use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend modifying land configuration, irrigation and mulch to reduce climatic risk in field crops.

Taxon
field cropse0
Treatment
changes in land configuration, irrigation and mulch applicatione0
Outcome
effective adaptive strategy to mitigate adverse weather susceptibility and climatic riskse0

Verbatim

e0

“the microclimatic alterations through changes in land configuration, irrigation and mulch application showed an effective adaptive strategy to mitigate adverse weather susceptibility and climatic risks in field crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1407 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.