Abstract
Abstract Incorporation of S-propyl dipropythiocarbamate (vernolate) to a depth of 5.0 cm in soil resulted in more vigor reduction of sweet potatoes [ Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] than incorporation to a depth of 10.0 to 12.5 cm. The initial plant response to vernolate by ‘Nemagold’ was greater than by either ‘Julian’ or ‘Centennial’. Yields of all 3 cultivars were not affected by vernolate at the rate of 2.2 kg/ha, but yields were reduced at rates of 4.5 and 6.7 kg/ha. Activated carbon applied as a suspension in the transplant water protected sweet potatoes from vigor reductions at rates of vernolate up to 6.7 kg/ha. Dipping roots in a suspension of activated carbon prior to transplanting failed to protect sweet potatoes from vernolate injury.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Vernolate incorporated at 5.0 cm reduced sweet potato vigor more than incorporation at 10.0 to 12.5 cm.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoes
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatase0 - Treatment
- vernolate) to a depth of 5.0 cme0
- Outcome
- vigore0
- Direction
- more vigor reductione0
- Comparator
- incorporation to a depth of 10.0 to 12.5 cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Incorporation of S-propyl dipropythiocarbamate (vernolate) to a depth of 5.0 cm in soil resulted in more vigor reduction of sweet potatoes [ Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] than incorporation to a depth of 10.0 to 12.5 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Nemagold had a greater initial response to vernolate than Julian or Centennial.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Material
- ‘Nemagold’e0
- Outcome
- initial plant response to vernolatee0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- ‘Julian’ or ‘Centennial’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The initial plant response to vernolate by ‘Nemagold’ was greater than by either ‘Julian’ or ‘Centennial’”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Vernolate at 2.2 kg/ha did not affect yields of three sweet potato cultivars.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Treatment
- vernolate at the rate of 2.2 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields of all 3 cultivars were not affected by vernolate at the rate of 2.2 kg/ha”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Vernolate at 4.5 kg/ha reduced yields.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Treatment
- 4.5e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yields were reduced at rates of 4.5 and 6.7 kg/ha”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Vernolate at 6.7 kg/ha reduced yields.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Treatment
- 6.7 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yields were reduced at rates of 4.5 and 6.7 kg/ha”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Activated carbon in transplant water protected sweet potatoes from vernolate vigor reductions up to 6.7 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
- Treatment
- Activated carbon applied as a suspension in the transplant watere0
- Outcome
- vigor reductionse0
- Direction
- protectede0
- Qualifier
- vernolate up to 6.7 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Activated carbon applied as a suspension in the transplant water protected sweet potatoes from vigor reductions at rates of vernolate up to 6.7 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dipping in activated carbon did not protect sweet potatoes from vernolate injury.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
- Treatment
- Dipping roots in a suspension of activated carbon prior to transplantinge0
- Outcome
- vernolate injurye0
- Direction
- failed to protecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dipping roots in a suspension of activated carbon prior to transplanting failed to protect sweet potatoes from vernolate injury”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →transplanting · crop injury · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.