Paper · 2022 · Chinese Medicine

Comparison of ONT and CCS sequencing technologies on the polyploid genome of a medicinal plant showed that high error rate of ONT reads are not suitable for self-correction

Peng Zeng; Zunzhe Tian; Yuwei Han; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many medicinal plants are known for their complex genomes with high ploidy, heterozygosity, and repetitive content which pose severe challenges for genome sequencing of those species. Long reads from Oxford nanopore sequencing technology (ONT) or Pacific Biosciences Single Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing offer great advantages in de novo genome assembly, especially for complex genomes with high heterozygosity and repetitive content. Currently, multiple allotetraploid species have sequenced their genomes by long-read sequencing. However, we found that a considerable proportion of these genomes (7.9% on average, maximum 23.7%) could not be covered by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) reads (uncovered region by NGS reads, UCR) suggesting the questionable and low-quality of those area or genomic areas that can't be sequenced by NGS due to sequencing bias. The underlying causes of those UCR in the genome assembly and solutions to this problem have never been studied. METHODS: In the study, we sequenced the tetraploid genome of Veratrum dahuricum (Turcz.) O. Loes (VDL), a Chinese medicinal plant, with ONT platform and assembled the genome with three strategies in parallel. We compared the qualities, coverage, and heterozygosity of the three ONT assemblies with another released assembly of the same individual using reads from PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS) technology, to explore the cause of the UCR. RESULTS: By mapping the NGS reads against the three ONT assemblies and the CCS assembly, we found that the coverage of those ONT assemblies by NGS reads ranged from 49.15 to 76.31%, much smaller than that of the CCS assembly (99.53%). And alignment between ONT assemblies and CCS assembly showed that most UCR can be aligned with CCS assembly. So, we conclude that the UCRs in ONT assembly are low-quality sequences with a high error rate that can't be aligned with short reads, rather than genomic regions that can't be sequenced by NGS. Further comparison among the intermediate versions of ONT assemblies showed that the most probable origin of those errors is a combination of artificial errors introduced by "self-correction" and initial sequencing error in long reads. We also found that polishing the ONT assembly with CCS reads can correct those errors efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Through analyzing genome features and reads alignment, we have found the causes for the high proportion of UCR in ONT assembly of VDL are sequencing errors and additional errors introduced by self-correction. The high error rates of ONT-raw reads make them not suitable for self-correction prior to allotetraploid genome assembly, as the self-correction will introduce artificial errors to > 5% of the UCR sequences. We suggest high-precision CCS reads be used to polish the assembly to correct those errors effectively for polyploid genomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coverage of the three ONT assemblies of Veratrum dahuricum by NGS reads ranged from 49.15 to 76.31%, much smaller than that of the CCS assembly.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Outcome
coverage of those ONT assemblies by NGS readse1
Value
49.15 to 76.31%e1
Comparator
CCS assemblye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“the coverage of those ONT assemblies by NGS reads ranged from 49.15 to 76.31%, much smaller than that of the CCS assembly (99.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1679 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CCS assembly of Veratrum dahuricum was covered by NGS reads at 99.53%, far above the ONT assemblies.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Outcome
coveragee1
Value
99.53%e1
Comparator
ONT assembliese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“the coverage of those ONT assemblies by NGS reads ranged from 49.15 to 76.31%, much smaller than that of the CCS assembly (99.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1679 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alignment between ONT assemblies and the CCS assembly showed that most uncovered regions (UCR) could be aligned with the CCS assembly.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Outcome
UCRe1
Comparator
CCS assemblye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“most UCR can be aligned with CCS assembly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1788 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The uncovered regions in the ONT assembly are low-quality sequences with a high error rate that cannot be aligned with short reads, not unsequenceable genomic regions.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Outcome
low-quality sequences with a high error ratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“the UCRs in ONT assembly are low-quality sequences with a high error rate that can't be aligned with short reads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1923 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most probable origin of errors in the ONT assemblies is a combination of artificial errors introduced by self-correction and initial sequencing error in long reads.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Treatment
self-correctione1
Outcome
errorse1
Qualifier
initial sequencing error in long readse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most probable origin of those errors is a combination of artificial errors introduced by "self-correction" and initial sequencing error in long reads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polishing the ONT assembly with CCS reads corrected the errors efficiently.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Treatment
polishing the ONT assembly with CCS readse1
Outcome
errorse1
Direction
correcte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“polishing the ONT assembly with CCS reads can correct those errors efficiently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-correction of ONT reads introduces artificial errors into more than 5% of the UCR sequences.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Treatment
self-correctione1
Outcome
artificial errorse1
Direction
introducee1
Value
> 5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“the self-correction will introduce artificial errors to > 5% of the UCR sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2667–2748 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using high-precision CCS reads to polish the assembly to correct errors effectively for polyploid genomes.

Taxon
Veratrum dahuricumVeratrum dahuricume0
Outcome
polish the assembly to correct those errorse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Veratrum dahuricum
Veratrum dahuricum · TaxonRepina Tatyana · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Veratrum dahuricum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“We suggest high-precision CCS reads be used to polish the assembly to correct those errors effectively for polyploid genomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2750–2874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A considerable proportion of published allotetraploid long-read genomes (7.9% on average, maximum 23.7%) could not be covered by NGS reads.

Taxon
allotetraploid speciese0
Outcome
could not be covered by NGSe1
Value
7.9% on averagee1

Verbatim

e0

“Currently, multiple allotetraploid species have sequenced their genomes by long-read sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“we found that a considerable proportion of these genomes (7.9% on average, maximum 23.7%) could not be covered by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) reads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–713 · show in text ↑