Paper · 2022 · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Reducing pesticide use in vineyards. Evidence from the analysis of the French DEPHY-Network

Fouillet, Esther; Delière, Laurent; Chartier, Nicolas; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

High quantities of pesticide are applied on vineyard. Transition towards low pesticide farming systems is a key issue to improve viticulture sustainability. Farmers have to gradually change their practices to engage in this transition. A large number of agroecological practices are already existing but farmers can encounter obstacles during their implementation. This work aims at analysing the pesticide use evolution during transition towards low pesticide farming systems and identify some management options mobilized by winegrowers. To understand the diversity of pathways taken towards agroecological transition, we characterized different types of pesticide use trajectories. We analysed the data from 244 cropping systems engaged in a network of French demonstration farms, DEPHY-Farm network, created to promote and assess the implementation of practices to reduce the pesticide use. The network provides data over a 10-year period across 12 winegrowing regions. To assess pesticide use, we used the Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) and focused on TFI trajectories. We described the TFI trajectory of each farm using six indicators: the initial TFI and final TFI, the intensity of the TFI decrease, two idicators of potential rupture and the slope. A Principal Component Analysis followed by an Ascendant Hierarchical Clustering were performed to build a typology of pesticide use trajectories. In addition, we performed a survey to identify, for each type of pesticide use trajectories, the levers implemented by winegrowers. Our results showed that cropping systems experienced a pesticide reduction of 33% in average related to the decrease of fungicide use. Three types of pesticide use trajectories were identified : the first type represents farms with a high initial TFI and an important reduction of TFI. The second type corresponds to farms with a low TFI when entering the network and that reduced it progressively. The last type represents farms with low initial TFI and without significant pesticide use evolution. Depending on the trajectory type, the intensity and the type of changes in fungicides applications and biocontrol used were different. From the surveys, 76 levers implemented by the winegrowers were recorded. The main levers implemented are related to the dose reduction, choice of the product, stop of herbicides and optimisation of spraying. The changes were characterized according to the ESR framework. Cluster 2 Farm mostly redesigned their cropping system while Cluster 3 Farms mostly implemented levers based on a gain on Efficiency. The context of the farm impacted changes in practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pesticide use fell by an average of 33% in the cropping systems, associated with lower fungicide use.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
pesticide reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
33%e0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“cropping systems experienced a pesticide reduction of 33% in average related to the decrease of fungicide use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three types of pesticide use trajectories were identified.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
Three types of pesticide use trajectoriese0
Value
Three typese0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Three types of pesticide use trajectories were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One trajectory comprised farms with high initial TFI and a large TFI reduction.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
reduction of TFIe0
Direction
reductione0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“the first type represents farms with a high initial TFI and an important reduction of TFI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second trajectory comprised farms starting with low TFI and reducing it progressively.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
TFIe0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The second type corresponds to farms with a low TFI when entering the network and that reduced it progressively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A third trajectory comprised low initial TFI farms without significant pesticide use change.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
pesticide use evolutione0
Direction
without significante0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The last type represents farms with low initial TFI and without significant pesticide use evolution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2036 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application and biocontrol changes differed by trajectory type.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
changes in fungicides applications and biocontrol usede0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
trajectory typee0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Depending on the trajectory type, the intensity and the type of changes in fungicides applications and biocontrol used were different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The surveys recorded 76 practices implemented by winegrowers.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
levers implemented by the winegrowerse0
Value
76 leverse0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“From the surveys, 76 levers implemented by the winegrowers were recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2172–2245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The main practices involved dose reduction, product choice, stopping herbicides and optimizing spraying.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
dose reduction, choice of the product, stop of herbicides and optimisation of sprayinge0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The main levers implemented are related to the dose reduction, choice of the product, stop of herbicides and optimisation of spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2246–2380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster 2 farms mostly redesigned their cropping systems.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
redesigned their cropping systeme0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cluster 2 Farm mostly redesigned their cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster 3 farms mostly adopted efficiency practices.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
implemented levers based on a gain on Efficiencye0

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cluster 3 Farms mostly implemented levers based on a gain on Efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2505–2577 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm context affected changes in practice.

Taxon
vineyardst0
Outcome
changes in practicese0
Setting
context of the farme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The context of the farm impacted changes in practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2578–2632 · show in text ↑