Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of farm manure applied at two doses on some chemical and physical properties of the soil. In addition, it was conducted to determine the relationships between the contribution of improved soil health and quality to the development of pear trees. For this purpose, farmyard manure of Etruşka variety grafted on a 6-year-old OHF 333 rootstock planted in Gedikhasanlı Research and Application Center was applied to the crown projection of the trees in three different doses (control, half dose: 5 kg tree-1 and full dose: 10 kg tree-1). At the end of the study, while there was no statistical difference between applications in 2018 and 2019 measurements in tree height measurements, 5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applications affected 2020 measurements significantly. When the number of shoots was examined, there was no statistical difference in the year of application (2018) and one year after (2019), while in 2020, 5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applications were higher than control. With the application of 10 kg farm manure per tree, the organic matter content of the soil was increased from "low" level (1.02%) to "medium" level (3.03%) at the end of the first year. A similar situation was valid for 5 kg tree-1 dose application, although the increase in the amount of organic matter was lower (2.45%). At the end of the second year, while the level of organic matter in soils where high dose application was applied was preserved as "medium" (2.14%), the low dose application lost its effectiveness and the level of organic matter fell back to the "low" class (1.45%). The most effective application reducing bulk density and penetration resistance was 10 kg tree-1 dose.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Manure doses did not significantly alter pear tree height in 2018 or 2019.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- applicationse0
- Outcome
- tree height measurementse0
- Direction
- no statistical differencee0
- Qualifier
- 2018 and 2019e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“there was no statistical difference between applications in 2018 and 2019 measurements in tree height measurements”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
Both 5 and 10 kg per tree manure doses significantly affected pear height in 2020.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- 5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applicationse0
- Outcome
- tree height measurementse1
- Qualifier
- 2020e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applications affected 2020 measurements significantly”
e1“tree height measurements”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot number showed no statistical difference in 2018 or 2019.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- farm manure applicationse1
- Outcome
- number of shootse2
- Direction
- no statistical differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“there was no statistical difference in the year of application (2018) and one year after (2019)”
e1“5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applications were higher than control. With the application of 10 kg farm manure per tree”
e2“the number of shoots”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
Pear shoot number was higher with both manure doses than control in 2020.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- 5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applicationse0
- Outcome
- number of shootse1
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“while in 2020, 5 kg tree-1 and 10 kg tree-1 farm manure applications were higher than control”
e1“the number of shoots”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten kg manure per tree raised first-year soil organic matter from 1.02% to 3.03%.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- 10 kg farm manure per treee0
- Outcome
- organic matter content of the soile0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.03%e0
- Qualifier
- at the end of the first yeare0
- Comparator
- "low" level (1.02%)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“With the application of 10 kg farm manure per tree, the organic matter content of the soil was increased from "low" level (1.02%) to "medium" level (3.03%) at the end of the first year”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
The 5 kg dose raised first-year soil organic matter to 2.45%, less than the high dose.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- 5 kg tree-1 dose applicatione0
- Outcome
- amount of organic mattere0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2.45%e0
- Comparator
- 10 kg farm manure per treee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A similar situation was valid for 5 kg tree-1 dose application, although the increase in the amount of organic matter was lower (2.45%)”
e1“10 kg farm manure per tree”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
High-dose soil organic matter remained medium at 2.14% after the second year.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- high dose applicatione0
- Outcome
- level of organic mattere0
- Value
- 2.14%e0
- Qualifier
- At the end of the second yeare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“At the end of the second year, while the level of organic matter in soils where high dose application was applied was preserved as "medium" (2.14%)”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
Low-dose soil organic matter fell back to the low class at 1.45% in year two.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- low dose applicatione0
- Outcome
- level of organic mattere0
- Direction
- fell backe0
- Value
- 1.45%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the low dose application lost its effectiveness and the level of organic matter fell back to the "low" class (1.45%)”
t0“Pear”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10 kg per tree dose most effectively reduced bulk density and penetration resistance.
- Taxon
- Pear
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- 10 kg tree-1 dosee0
- Outcome
- bulk density and penetration resistancee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The most effective application reducing bulk density and penetration resistance was 10 kg tree-1 dose”
t0“Pear”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.