Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Organic management for yams (Dioscorea spp.) intercropped in coconut (Cocos nucifera) plantation: Evidences from a validation trial in the coastal humid tropics of Kerala, India

G SUJA; P SUBRAMANIAN; R SUREKHA; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted under Network Project on Organic Horticulture during 2015–17 (April-January) at ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CPCRI), Kasaragod, to validate the ICAR-CTCRI developed organic farming technologies in yams under intercropping in an organically raised mature coconut garden (>48 years). Three species of Dioscorea [(greater yam (D. alata), lesser yam (D. esculenta) and white yam (D. rotundata)] were tested under four production systems, viz. traditional, conventional, integrated and organic, and replicated thrice in split plot design in a mature coconut garden. Organic practice was similar to conventional as revealed from the identical impacts on yield, tuber quality and soil chemical properties. Yield under organic management was 98.6% of conventional farming. D. alata and D. esculenta were more responsive (+8 to 10%) to organic management, but organic management lowered yield by 30% in dwarf white yam (D. rotundata). The organic farming package comprising farmyard manure, green manure cowpea, neem cake and ash resulted in higher available N, exchangeable Ca and available Zn in soil and significant improvement in K, higher P and Mg contents in yam tubers. However, the highest profit was realized from coconut + D. alata in integrated system (`1,87,057/ha). Among yams, greater yam (D. alata) was the most productive and profitable under organic management (`1,46,634/ha) in intercropping set up.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic practice had impacts on yield, tuber quality and soil chemistry similar to conventional farming.

Taxon
yamst0
Treatment
Organic practicee0
Outcome
yield, tuber quality and soil chemical propertiese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
conventionale0

Verbatim

e0

“Organic practice was similar to conventional as revealed from the identical impacts on yield, tuber quality and soil chemical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“yams (Dioscorea spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic yield was 98.6% of conventional yield.

Taxon
yamst0
Treatment
organic managemente0
Outcome
Yielde0
Value
98.6%e0
Comparator
conventional farminge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Yield under organic management was 98.6% of conventional farming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“yams (Dioscorea spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. alata was 8 to 10% more responsive to organic management.

Taxon
D. alataDioscorea alatae0
Treatment
organic managemente0
Outcome
responsivee0
Direction
moree0
Value
+8 to 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D. alata and D. esculenta were more responsive (+8 to 10%) to organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. esculenta was 8 to 10% more responsive to organic management.

Taxon
D. esculentaDioscorea esculentae0
Treatment
organic managemente0
Outcome
responsivee0
Direction
moree0
Value
+8 to 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea esculenta
Dioscorea esculenta · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D. alata and D. esculenta were more responsive (+8 to 10%) to organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic management lowered D. rotundata yield by 30%.

Treatment
organic managemente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata · TaxonDorcas Atule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic management lowered yield by 30% in dwarf white yam (D. rotundata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic farming increased available N, exchangeable Ca and available Zn in soil.

Taxon
yamst0
Treatment
organic farming package comprising farmyard manure, green manure cowpea, neem cake and ashe0
Outcome
available N, exchangeable Ca and available Zn in soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The organic farming package comprising farmyard manure, green manure cowpea, neem cake and ash resulted in higher available N, exchangeable Ca and available Zn in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“yams (Dioscorea spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic farming improved K content in yam tubers.

Taxon
yame0
Treatment
organic farming packagee1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in K, higher P and Mg contents in yam tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic farming package comprising farmyard manure, green manure cowpea, neem cake and ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic farming raised P and Mg contents in yam tubers.

Taxon
yame0
Treatment
organic farming packagee1
Outcome
P and Mg contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in K, higher P and Mg contents in yam tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic farming package comprising farmyard manure, green manure cowpea, neem cake and ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1079 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated coconut plus D. alata had the highest profit at `1,87,057/ha.

Taxon
D. alataDioscorea alatae0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
`1,87,057/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest profit was realized from coconut + D. alata in integrated system (`1,87,057/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. alata was the most productive and profitable organic yam, with `1,46,634/ha.

Taxon
D. alataDioscorea alatae0
Outcome
productive and profitablee0
Direction
moste0
Value
`1,46,634/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater yam (D. alata) was the most productive and profitable under organic management (`1,46,634/ha) in intercropping set up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1466 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Dioscorea cayenensis (yellow yam)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · soil: chemistry · DioscoreaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · DioscoreaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · DioscoreaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.