Abstract
Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions. Field experiments were conducted in the 2019 and 2021 growing seasons in the Bursa province of Turkey. Experiments were carried out in completely randomised blocks design with three replications. Irrigations were scheduled based on the replenishment of 100 (S1), 66 (S2), 33 (S3), and 0% (S4) of soil water depletion within the soil profile of 90 cm using 7-day irrigation intervals. In 2019, root yields varied between 29.32 (S4)-86.31 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.33-13.57 t/ha. In 2021, root yields varied between 26.18 (S4)-74.56 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.56-12.53 t/ha. Effects of different irrigation levels on investigated parameters were found to be significant (P < 0.01). The crop water consumption values were significantly related to root and sugar yields (P < 0.01). Based on present findings, S1 treatment was recommended to get the highest root and sugar yields. In case of limited water resources, S2 (33% water shortage) treatment with the highest water productivity and irrigation water productivity values could be recommended to ensure maximum efficiency from the applied irrigation water quantity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Root yield in 2019 was higher under full replenishment (S1) than under no irrigation (S4).
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- replenishment of 100 (S1)e1
- Outcome
- root yieldse2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 29.32 (S4)-86.31 (S1) t/hae2
- Qualifier
- In 2019e2
- Comparator
- S4e2
- Setting
- Bursa province of Turkeye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e1“Irrigations were scheduled based on the replenishment of 100 (S1), 66 (S2), 33 (S3), and 0% (S4) of soil water depletion”
e2“In 2019, root yields varied between 29.32 (S4)-86.31 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.33-13.57 t/ha”
e3“Field experiments were conducted in the 2019 and 2021 growing seasons in the Bursa province of Turkey”
Claim · model-written summary
Root yield in 2021 was higher under full replenishment (S1) than under no irrigation (S4).
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- replenishment of 100 (S1)e1
- Outcome
- root yieldse2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 26.18 (S4)-74.56 (S1) t/hae2
- Qualifier
- In 2021e2
- Comparator
- S4e2
- Setting
- Bursa province of Turkeye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e1“Irrigations were scheduled based on the replenishment of 100 (S1), 66 (S2), 33 (S3), and 0% (S4) of soil water depletion”
e2“In 2021, root yields varied between 26.18 (S4)-74.56 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.56-12.53 t/ha”
e3“Field experiments were conducted in the 2019 and 2021 growing seasons in the Bursa province of Turkey”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar yield in 2019 ranged from 6.33 to 13.57 t/ha across irrigation levels.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Outcome
- sugar yieldse2
- Value
- 6.33-13.57 t/hae2
- Qualifier
- In 2019e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e2“In 2019, root yields varied between 29.32 (S4)-86.31 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.33-13.57 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar yield in 2021 ranged from 6.56 to 12.53 t/ha across irrigation levels.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Outcome
- sugar yieldse2
- Value
- 6.56-12.53 t/hae2
- Qualifier
- In 2021e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e2“In 2021, root yields varied between 26.18 (S4)-74.56 (S1) t/ha and sugar yields between 6.56-12.53 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation levels significantly affected the investigated parameters.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- different irrigation levelse4
- Outcome
- investigated parameterse4
- Qualifier
- P < 0.01e4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e4“Effects of different irrigation levels on investigated parameters were found to be significant (P < 0.01)”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop water consumption was significantly related to root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- crop water consumptione5
- Outcome
- root and sugar yieldse5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e5“The crop water consumption values were significantly related to root and sugar yields (P < 0.01)”
Claim · model-written summary
S1 treatment (full replenishment) is recommended for the highest root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- S1 treatmente6
- Outcome
- highest root and sugar yieldse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e6“S1 treatment was recommended to get the highest root and sugar yields”
Claim · model-written summary
The S2 (33% water shortage) treatment gave the highest water productivity and irrigation water productivity.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- S2 (33% water shortage) treatmente7
- Outcome
- water productivity and irrigation water productivitye7
- Direction
- higheste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Present experiments were conducted to determine the effects of different irrigation levels on yield, yield components and quality of drip-irrigated sugar beet under sub-humid conditions”
e7“S2 (33% water shortage) treatment with the highest water productivity and irrigation water productivity values could be recommended”
The same questions in other papers
drought · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.