Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Agronematology

Effect of Different Bioagents on the Population Density of Meloidogyne incognita Infected Tomato Plants

Abo-Korah, M.; Sweelam, Mohamed Elameen Mohamed; Yassin, Asmaa

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of two isolates of fungi (Glomus mosseae - Trichoderma harzianum); two isolates of bacteria (Azotobacter chroococcum - Pseudomonas fluorescens), and two nematodes (Steinernema feltiae- Diplogaster lheritieri) was evaluated against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. The experiment was conducted in plastic pots (25 cm) at the Research Station of the Faculty of Agriculture in Shebin El-kom, El-Menoufia Governorate. Statistical analysis of the obtained results recorded that predatory nematode, D. lheritieri gave the highest reduction percentage (84.0%) in M. incognita juveniles, as well as it reduced root gall index (60.0%) and mature females (72.3%), compared to the nematicide oxamyl that gave 84.2 & 80.0 %, respectively. Triple treatment of D. lheritieri + A. chroococcum + G. mosseae was superior recording only 184.7 J2 / 100 cm3 soil with a reduction percentage of 88.5 % compared to the rest of bio-agents. From the obtained results, it can be recommended to use such treatment which achieved the highest decrease percentages of soil nematodes, number of females and root knot galls compared to oxamyl.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predatory nematode D. lheritieri gave the highest reduction (84.0%) in M. incognita juveniles on tomato.

Treatment
predatory nematode, D. lheritierie1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
D. lheritieriPristionchus lheritierie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
M. incognita juvenilese1
Direction
highest reductione1
Value
84.0%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“predatory nematode, D. lheritieri gave the highest reduction percentage (84.0%) in M. incognita juveniles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. lheritieri reduced the root gall index by 60.0% in M. incognita-infected tomato, compared with the nematicide oxamyl.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root gall indexe2
Direction
reducede2
Value
60.0%e2
Qualifier
84.2 & 80.0 %, respectivelye2
Comparator
oxamyle2

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“it reduced root gall index (60.0%) and mature females (72.3%), compared to the nematicide oxamyl that gave 84.2 & 80.0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. lheritieri reduced mature females of M. incognita by 72.3% on tomato, compared with the nematicide oxamyl.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
mature femalese2
Direction
reducede2
Value
72.3%e2
Qualifier
84.2 & 80.0 %, respectivelye2
Comparator
oxamyle2

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“it reduced root gall index (60.0%) and mature females (72.3%), compared to the nematicide oxamyl that gave 84.2 & 80.0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The triple treatment D. lheritieri + A. chroococcum + G. mosseae was superior, leaving 184.7 J2 per 100 cm3 soil with an 88.5% reduction compared with the other bioagents.

Treatment
Triple treatment of D. lheritieri + A. chroococcum + G. mosseaee3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
D. lheritieriPristionchus lheritierie3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
J2 / 100 cm3 soile3
Direction
reductione3
Value
88.5 %e3
Qualifier
only 184.7 J2 / 100 cm3 soile3
Comparator
the rest of bio-agentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–335 · show in text ↑
e3

“Triple treatment of D. lheritieri + A. chroococcum + G. mosseae was superior recording only 184.7 J2 / 100 cm3 soil with a reduction percentage of 88.5 % compared to the rest of bio-agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–988 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the triple bioagent treatment, which gave the largest decreases in soil nematodes, females and root knot galls compared with oxamyl.

Outcome
highest decrease percentages of soil nematodes, number of females and root knot gallse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato plants under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–335 · show in text ↑
e4

“it can be recommended to use such treatment which achieved the highest decrease percentages of soil nematodes, number of females and root knot galls compared to oxamyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1184 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Pristionchus lheritieri · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter chroococcum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.