Paper · 2021 · Muthanna Journal for Agricultural Sciences

Response of wheat Triticum aestivum L. to biofertiilizer under levels of different water salinity

Shaimaa Ibrahim mahmoud; Turki moften Saad; Salama tahseen Ali

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tow field experiment was carried out in college of agriculture- university of almuthanna during seasnos 2019-2020, 2020-2021. In Al-Bandar site. To study effect four levels of water salinity (1, 3, 6, 9 ds m-1) their characters (S1, S2, S3, S4) respectively , and four treatments of bacteria inoculation (control, Azospirillum b. , Bacillus S., mixture of Azospirillum*Bacillus) their characters ( C, A, B, A*B) respectively. To study their effect on growth and yield of wheat and concentration of nitration elements, sodium and Proline. the experiment was applied with design of Strip split block , the levels of water salinity arranged in main plot and inoculation treatments arranged in sub plot. the results showed there is high significant differences in almost characters under study, the treat of inoculation was superiority in content plant of nitrogen, phosphors and potassium, and get highest mean in grain yield with treat inoculation AB its reached 3.52 and 3.82 ton h-1. The treat with salinity water S3 was superiority in no. of seed in spike reached 32 and 34.42 seed spike-1 in both season respectively. Where in total yield in S3 was reached 3.79 and 3.85 ton h-1 both season respectively. So the result interaction showed superiority the combination (AB*S3) in almost characters and get highest mean of total yield reached 4.76 and 5.30 ton h-1 both season respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation gave superior plant nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
content plant of nitrogen, phosphors and potassiume0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treat of inoculation was superiority in content plant of nitrogen, phosphors and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AB inoculation had the highest grain yield in the two seasons.

Treatment
inoculation ABe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.52 and 3.82 ton h-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest mean in grain yield with treat inoculation AB its reached 3.52 and 3.82 ton h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3 salinity yielded the highest seeds per spike in both seasons.

Treatment
salinity water S3e0
Outcome
no. of seed in spikee0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
32 and 34.42 seed spike-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity water S3 was superiority in no. of seed in spike reached 32 and 34.42 seed spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield under S3 reached 3.79 and 3.85 ton per hectare in the two seasons.

Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Value
3.79 and 3.85 ton h-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total yield in S3 was reached 3.79 and 3.85 ton h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AB by S3 combination gave the highest total yield in both seasons.

Treatment
AB*S3e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.76 and 5.30 ton h-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination (AB*S3) in almost characters and get highest mean of total yield reached 4.76 and 5.30 ton h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–38 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.