Abstract
Gunungkidul is a production center of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), a carbohydrate source and raw material for food industry. AMF inoculation in cassava plants is known to increase biomass production. However, little studies have been conducted on the response of cassava to mycorrhizal inoculation and organic fertilizer. Therefore, this study was aimed at examining the effects of AMF inoculation and types of manure on the AMF colonization and yield of cassava in Gunungkidul. The research was carried out by planting cassava in Alfisol Gunungkidul arranged in a randomized complete block design with two factors, AMF doses of 25g; 50; and 75g/plant; and types of manure i.e. cow, goat, and poultry manure, for five months period. Rhizosphere soil and root samples were analyzed for AMF colonization and the spores number. The results showed that AMF-infected cassava roots combined with cow or goat manure application produced more spores than poultry manure. AMF infection and manure, thus, significantly resulted in better root proliferation, root forehead weight, tuber diameter, and cassava products, than the absence of both treatments. Cow manure combined with AMF at a dose of 25 g/plant significantly affected the dry weight of cassava roots. This study implies that applying AMF and manure provide a substantial contribution on the growth and production of cassava.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Cow or goat manure with AMF-infected cassava roots produced more AMF spores than poultry manure.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- cow or goat manure applicatione0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- sporese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- poultry manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF-infected cassava roots combined with cow or goat manure application produced more spores than poultry manure”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF infection and manure increased cassava root proliferation relative to neither treatment.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- AMF infection and manuree0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- root proliferatione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the absence of both treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF infection and manure, thus, significantly resulted in better root proliferation, root forehead weight, tuber diameter, and cassava products, than the absence of both treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF infection and manure increased cassava root forehead weight relative to neither treatment.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- AMF infection and manuree0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- root forehead weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the absence of both treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF infection and manure, thus, significantly resulted in better root proliferation, root forehead weight, tuber diameter, and cassava products, than the absence of both treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF infection and manure increased cassava tuber diameter relative to neither treatment.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- AMF infection and manuree0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- tuber diametere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the absence of both treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF infection and manure, thus, significantly resulted in better root proliferation, root forehead weight, tuber diameter, and cassava products, than the absence of both treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF infection and manure increased cassava cassava products relative to neither treatment.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- AMF infection and manuree0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- cassava productse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the absence of both treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF infection and manure, thus, significantly resulted in better root proliferation, root forehead weight, tuber diameter, and cassava products, than the absence of both treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure with 25 g/plant AMF significantly affected cassava root dry weight; direction was unspecified.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- Cow manure combined with AMF at a dose of 25 g/plante0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weight of cassava rootse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow manure combined with AMF at a dose of 25 g/plant significantly affected the dry weight of cassava roots”
The same questions in other papers
infection · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · organism · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.