Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 4.2 ton/ha chicken manure treatment gave the highest dry root yield of cassava.

A claim from Effect of Chicken Manure Application on Cassava Biomass and Root Yields in Two Agro-Ecologies of Zambia · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.2 ton/ha chicken manure treatment gave the highest dry root yield of cassava.

Treatment
application of 4.2 ton/ha of chicken manuree1
Outcome
dry root yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
9.55 ton/hae1
Setting
Kabangwe and Mansae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of chicken manure on cassava root and biomass yield at Kabangwe and Mansa, two locations representing agroecological zones II and III, respectively, in Zambia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–459
e1

“The highest mean fresh (27.66 ton/ha) and dry root yield (9.55 ton/ha), and total fresh biomass (53.68 ton/ha) and dry biomass (16.12 ton/ha) production were achieved with the application of 4.2 ton/ha of chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1335

Title

Effect of Chicken Manure Application on Cassava Biomass and Root Yields in Two Agro-Ecologies of Zambia

Gizachew Biratu; Eyasu Elias; Pheneas Ntawuruhunga; et al. Agriculture 2018. doi:10.3390/agriculture8040045

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-0e76bf740925d0df2ab6acffefe8899830cfd6dbef3fb5acb4e549a6ee060edd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.