Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Species Choice Influences Weed Suppression, N Sharing and Crop Productivity in Oilseed Rape–Legume Intercrops

Elana Dayoub; Guillaume Piva; Steven J. Shirtliffe; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing crop trait diversity in oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.) cropping systems by introducing frost-sensitive legume species could improve weed suppression and crop productivity. Intercrops and sole crops were compared over two years in the field in Western France. Winter OR was intercropped simultaneously with either spring faba bean (Vicia faba L.) or common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) in a row replacement design without herbicides. Each species was sown at 50% of the recommended sole crop density in alternate rows. Due to the high values of faba bean aboveground traits (height, leaf area, and biomass) and the strong competitive ability for soil N of OR, both species appeared complementary in resource utilization, and thus less soil N and light were available for weeds. The OR–faba bean intercrop was able to reduce weed biomass by 41% compared to the OR–common vetch intercrop. Furthermore, growth and competitive ability of OR for soil N were increased when intercropped with faba bean. Both grain yield and number per plant were three times higher in OR–faba bean intercrops compared to OR sole crops. Under high weed infestation, the presence of faba bean with OR reduced weed aboveground biomass by 35% and weed N accumulation by 11% compared to the OR sole crop. No change was observed in the weed community composition. We observed that a level of aboveground biomass greater than 2 t ha−1 and a soil N uptake at approximately 80 kg ha−1 was needed to reduce biomass and N content of weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean traits and oilseed rape competition for soil N complemented resource use, leaving less soil N and light for weeds.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
less soil N and light were available for weedse0
Qualifier
complementary in resource utilizatione0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the high values of faba bean aboveground traits (height, leaf area, and biomass) and the strong competitive ability for soil N of OR, both species appeared complementary in resource utilization, and thus less soil N and light were available for weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oilseed rape–faba bean intercrop reduced weed biomass by 41% relative to the oilseed rape–common vetch intercrop.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
OR–faba bean intercrope0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
41%e0
Comparator
OR–common vetch intercrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OR–faba bean intercrop was able to reduce weed biomass by 41% compared to the OR–common vetch intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with faba bean increased oilseed rape growth.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
intercropped with faba beane0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and competitive ability of OR for soil N were increased when intercropped with faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1006 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with faba bean increased oilseed rape competitive ability for soil N.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
intercropped with faba beane0
Outcome
competitive ability of OR for soil Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and competitive ability of OR for soil N were increased when intercropped with faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1006 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed rape grain yield was three times higher with faba bean intercropping than in sole crops.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
OR–faba bean intercropse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
three timese0
Comparator
OR sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both grain yield and number per plant were three times higher in OR–faba bean intercrops compared to OR sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed rape grain number per plant was three times higher with faba bean intercropping than in sole crops.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
OR–faba bean intercropse0
Outcome
number per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
three timese0
Comparator
OR sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both grain yield and number per plant were three times higher in OR–faba bean intercrops compared to OR sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high weed infestation, faba bean intercropping reduced weed aboveground biomass by 35% compared with sole oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
presence of faba bean with ORe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed aboveground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0
Qualifier
Under high weed infestatione0
Comparator
OR sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high weed infestation, the presence of faba bean with OR reduced weed aboveground biomass by 35% and weed N accumulation by 11% compared to the OR sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high weed infestation, faba bean intercropping reduced weed N accumulation by 11% compared with sole oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
presence of faba bean with ORe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed N accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%e0
Qualifier
Under high weed infestatione0
Comparator
OR sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high weed infestation, the presence of faba bean with OR reduced weed aboveground biomass by 35% and weed N accumulation by 11% compared to the OR sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed community composition showed no change.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed community compositione0
Direction
No changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No change was observed in the weed community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors observed that aboveground biomass greater than 2 t ha−1 was needed to reduce weed biomass and N content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
biomass and N content of weedse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
greater than 2 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a level of aboveground biomass greater than 2 t ha−1 and a soil N uptake at approximately 80 kg ha−1 was needed to reduce biomass and N content of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors observed that soil N uptake around 80 kg ha−1 was needed to reduce weed biomass and N content.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
biomass and N content of weedse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
approximately 80 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a level of aboveground biomass greater than 2 t ha−1 and a soil N uptake at approximately 80 kg ha−1 was needed to reduce biomass and N content of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“oilseed rape (OR, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–71 · show in text ↑

Vicia faba · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

intercropping · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · weed · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.