Paper · 1974 · HortScience

Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1

M. A. Shehata; D. W. Davis; P. E. Read

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Shoot tip cuttings of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) taken at various times, ages, and condition were subjected to several pre- and post-selection techniques known to influence rooting in other species. Succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide (SADH) applied 1 week before shoot tip harvest increased the rooting of cuttings. Neither time of day cuttings were prepared (7 AM or 1 PM) nor fruit load influenced rooting. Sand culture under mist, at 27°C (day), 21° (night), in the greenhouse was superior to other rooting methods tested. Cultivars varied in rooting. Cuttings from early planting rooted better than those from late plantings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SADH applied one week before shoot tip harvest increased rooting of cucumber cuttings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide (SADH) applied 1 week before shoot tip harveste1
Outcome
rooting of cuttingse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“Succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide (SADH) applied 1 week before shoot tip harvest increased the rooting of cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of day cuttings were prepared (7 AM or 1 PM) did not influence rooting of cucumber cuttings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
time of day cuttings were prepared (7 AM or 1 PM)e2
Outcome
rootinge2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“Neither time of day cuttings were prepared (7 AM or 1 PM) nor fruit load influenced rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit load did not influence rooting of cucumber cuttings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
fruit loade2
Outcome
rootinge2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“Neither time of day cuttings were prepared (7 AM or 1 PM) nor fruit load influenced rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand culture under mist in the greenhouse was superior to other rooting methods tested for cucumber cuttings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Sand culture under miste3
Outcome
was superior to other rooting methods testede3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
other rooting methodse3
Setting
in the greenhousee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sand culture under mist, at 27°C (day), 21° (night), in the greenhouse was superior to other rooting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber cultivars varied in rooting of shoot tip cuttings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Cultivarse4
Outcome
rootinge4
Qualifier
variede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cultivars varied in rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings from early planting rooted better than cuttings from late plantings.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
early plantinge5
Outcome
rootede5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
late plantingse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vegetative Propagation of Cucumber1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cuttings from early planting rooted better than those from late plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–642 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

sowing time · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.