Paper · 2022 · FUDMA Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology

EFFECT OF WEED CONTROL TREATMENTS, SOWING DATE AND SOWING METHOD ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) IN SUDAN SAVANNA OF NIGERIA

T.T BELLO; M. A MAHADI; A LADO

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during 2016, 2017 and 2018 rainy seasons at the Research Farm of National Institute for Horticultural Research (NIHORT) Bagauda (Latitude 11̊ 33ꞌ N and Longitude 8̊ 23ꞌ E, 481m above sea level) Kano, in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of weed control treatments, sowing dates and methods on the growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.). The experiment consisted of three (3) sowing date (late June, early July and late July), three (3) sowing methods (broadcasting, drilling and dibbling) and six weed control treatment (atrazine at 0.8 or 1.2kg a.i.ha-1, 2,4-D at 0.5 or 0.75kg a.i. ha-1, two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) and weedy check). These were laid out in a split-split-plot design and replicated three (3) times. Sowing dates were assigned to main plot, sowing methods to subplot while weed control to sub-sub plots. The results revealed that sowing on late June and early July produced significantly taller plant and higher grain yield. Broadcasting produced higher number of tillers (m-2) and grain yield in 2016 (887.3kg ha-1), 2017 (1230.0kg ha-1) and 2018 (1255.0kgha-1). Furthermore, two hoe weeding produced significantly higher grain yield (kgha-1) in all the seasons which were statistically similar with plots treated with atrazine at 1.2kg a.i. ha-1 and those treated with 2,4-D at 0.5 and 0.75kg a.i. ha-1. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that finger millet should be sown between late June to early July by broadcasting method and application of either atrazine at 1.2 kg a.i. ha-1 pre-emergence or 2,4-D at 0.5kg a.i. ha-1 post-emergence for higher grain yield (kgha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in late June and early July produced significantly taller finger millet plants.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
sowing on late June and early Julye2
Outcome
taller plante2
Direction
tallere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“sowing on late June and early July produced significantly taller plant and higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in late June and early July produced higher finger millet grain yield.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
sowing on late June and early Julye2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“sowing on late June and early July produced significantly taller plant and higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcasting produced a higher number of finger millet tillers.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Broadcastinge3
Outcome
number of tillers (m-2)e3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Broadcasting produced higher number of tillers (m-2) and grain yield in 2016 (887.3kg ha-1), 2017 (1230.0kg ha-1) and 2018 (1255.0kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcasting gave a grain yield of 887.3kg ha-1 in 2016.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Broadcastinge3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
887.3kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
2016e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Broadcasting produced higher number of tillers (m-2) and grain yield in 2016 (887.3kg ha-1), 2017 (1230.0kg ha-1) and 2018 (1255.0kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcasting gave a grain yield of 1230.0kg ha-1 in 2017.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Broadcastinge3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
1230.0kg ha-1e3
Qualifier
2017e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Broadcasting produced higher number of tillers (m-2) and grain yield in 2016 (887.3kg ha-1), 2017 (1230.0kg ha-1) and 2018 (1255.0kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcasting gave a grain yield of 1255.0kgha-1 in 2018.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Broadcastinge3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
1255.0kgha-1e3
Qualifier
2018e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Broadcasting produced higher number of tillers (m-2) and grain yield in 2016 (887.3kg ha-1), 2017 (1230.0kg ha-1) and 2018 (1255.0kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoe weedings gave grain yield statistically similar to atrazine at 1.2kg a.i. ha-1, and higher grain yield in all seasons.

Taxon
FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
two hoe weedinge4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
statistically similare4
Comparator
plots treated with atrazine at 1.2kg a.i. ha-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FINGER MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“two hoe weeding produced significantly higher grain yield (kgha-1) in all the seasons which were statistically similar with plots treated with atrazine at 1.2kg a.i. ha-1 and those treated with 2,4-D at 0.5 and 0.75kg a.i. ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1448 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Finger millet should be sown between late June and early July by broadcasting, with atrazine or 2,4-D herbicide, for higher grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae5
Treatment
sown between late June to early July by broadcasting methode5
Outcome
higher grain yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“finger millet should be sown between late June to early July by broadcasting method and application of either atrazine at 1.2 kg a.i. ha-1 pre-emergence or 2,4-D at 0.5kg a.i. ha-1 post-emergence for higher grain yield (kgha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1727 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

sowing time · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.