Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Acrophialophora jodhpurensis: an endophytic plant growth promoting fungus with biocontrol effect against Alternaria alternata

Zoha Daroodi; Parissa Taheri; Saeed Tarighi

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, efficiency of the endophytic fungal isolate Msh5 was evaluated on promoting tomato plant growth and controlling Alternaria alternata , the causal agent of early blight in tomatoes. Morphological and molecular (ITS and tub2 sequences) analyses revealed that the fungal isolate, Msh5, was Acrophialophora jodhpurensis ( Chaetomium jodhpurense Lodha). This beneficial fungus was capable of producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), urease, siderophore, extracellular enzymes, and solubilized phosphate. Under laboratory conditions, the Msh5 isolate of A. jodhpurensis inhibited A. alternata growth in dual culture, volatile and non-volatile metabolites assays. The supernatant of this endophytic fungus was capable of reducing spore germination and altering the hyphal structure of A. alternata and the spores produced germ tubes showed vacuolization and abnormal structure compared to the control. Also, the effect of A. jodhpurensis on plant growth parameters (such as shoot and root weight and length) and suppressing A. alternata was investigated in vivo via seed inoculation with spores of A. jodhpurensis using 1% sugar, 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) or 0.5% molasses solution as stickers. Colonization of tomato roots by the endophytic fungus resulted in significant increasing plant growth parameters and reduction in the progress of the diseases caused by A. alternata compared to the controls. Among the different coating materials used as stickers, sugar was found to be the most effective for enhancing plant growth parameters and decreasing the disease progress. Therefore, A. jodhpurensis isolate Msh5 can be suggested as a potential biofertilizer and biocontrol agent for protecting tomato plants against A. alternata .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Msh5 was identified as Acrophialophora jodhpurensis.

Interactor
Acrophialophora jodhpurensisAcrophialophora jodhpurensise0symbiont
Outcome
fungal isolate, Msh5, was Acrophialophora jodhpurensise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungal isolate, Msh5, was Acrophialophora jodhpurensis ( Chaetomium jodhpurense Lodha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–363 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoting tomato plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The endophyte produced IAA, urease, siderophore and enzymes and solubilized phosphate.

Interactor
funguse0symbiont
Outcome
producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), urease, siderophoree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This beneficial fungus was capable of producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), urease, siderophore, extracellular enzymes, and solubilized phosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–510 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoting tomato plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Msh5 inhibited Alternaria growth in culture assays.

Treatment
Msh5 isolate of A. jodhpurensise0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Second interactor
A. jodhpurensisAcrophialophora jodhpurensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. alternata growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Msh5 isolate of A. jodhpurensis inhibited A. alternata growth in dual culture, volatile and non-volatile metabolites assays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoting tomato plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte supernatant reduced Alternaria spore germination and altered its hyphae.

Treatment
supernatant of this endophytic funguse0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
spore germinatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The supernatant of this endophytic fungus was capable of reducing spore germination and altering the hyphal structure of A. alternata and the spores produced germ tubes showed vacuolization and abnormal structure compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoting tomato plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root colonization increased shoot and root growth.

Treatment
Colonization of tomato roots by the endophytic funguse0
Interactor
endophytic funguse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of tomato roots by the endophytic fungus resulted in significant increasing plant growth parameters and reduction in the progress of the diseases caused by A. alternata compared to the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization reduced Alternaria disease progress.

Treatment
Colonization of tomato roots by the endophytic funguse0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Second interactor
endophytic funguse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
progress of the diseases caused by A. alternatae0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of tomato roots by the endophytic fungus resulted in significant increasing plant growth parameters and reduction in the progress of the diseases caused by A. alternata compared to the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar was the most effective coating for enhancing growth and reducing disease.

Treatment
sugare0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar was found to be the most effective for enhancing plant growth parameters and decreasing the disease progress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1588 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoting tomato plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Msh5 as a tomato biofertilizer and biocontrol agent.

Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
potential biofertilizer and biocontrol agente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. jodhpurensis isolate Msh5 can be suggested as a potential biofertilizer and biocontrol agent for protecting tomato plants against A. alternata .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1747 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 26 positive, 33 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.