Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

The Effect of Rotational Cropping of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) on Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Communities

Lili Tang; Chao Fan; Hongmei Yuan; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop rotation affects soil properties and soil microbial diversity and structure. Currently, it is not well understood how soil microbial diversity changes following different crop rotation systems of industrial hemp, an ancient and economically important crop. Therefore, these changes were analyzed in this study. Our results showed that different rotation systems significantly affected the wilt disease incidence, plant height, yield, soil physicochemical properties and soil microbial communities in the greenhouse. The rotation systems used in this study significantly reduced the plant mortality and increased the yield compared with a monoculture system. The levels of alkaline hydrolysis and available phosphorus in the soil decreased significantly compared with a monoculture cropping system. Using MiSeq high-throughput sequencing, we showed that the soil diversity and number of bacteria and fungi were significantly higher for rotation systems and controls compared to the monoculture system. The relative abundance of pathogens increased with a monoculture system. Redundancy analysis suggests that soil properties may also affect the soil microbial composition. Taken together, different rotation systems used in this study significantly decreased the disease incidence, increased plant yields and increased soil microbial diversity compared with monoculture for industrial hemp. We believe that applying these rotation systems is an efficient and eco-friendly approach to control soil borne pathogenic diseases and increase floral yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation systems significantly reduced hemp plant mortality compared with a monoculture system.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
rotation systemse1
Outcome
plant mortalitye1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
a monoculture systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rotation systems used in this study significantly reduced the plant mortality and increased the yield compared with a monoculture system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation systems significantly increased hemp yield compared with a monoculture system.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
rotation systemse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
a monoculture systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rotation systems used in this study significantly reduced the plant mortality and increased the yield compared with a monoculture system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation systems significantly decreased the disease incidence in hemp.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
rotation systemse1
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“different rotation systems used in this study significantly decreased the disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alkaline hydrolysis and available phosphorus levels decreased significantly compared with a monoculture cropping system.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Outcome
levels of alkaline hydrolysis and available phosphorus in the soile1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
a monoculture cropping systeme1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The levels of alkaline hydrolysis and available phosphorus in the soil decreased significantly compared with a monoculture cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil diversity and the number of bacteria and fungi were significantly higher under rotation systems and controls than under the monoculture system.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
rotation systemse1
Outcome
soil diversity and number of bacteria and fungie1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the monoculture systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil diversity and number of bacteria and fungi were significantly higher for rotation systems and controls compared to the monoculture system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundance of pathogens increased under the monoculture system.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
a monoculture systeme1
Interactor
pathogense1pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of pathogense1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative abundance of pathogens increased with a monoculture system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1077 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redundancy analysis suggests that soil properties may also affect soil microbial composition.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
soil propertiese1
Outcome
soil microbial compositione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Redundancy analysis suggests that soil properties may also affect the soil microbial composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1175 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors believe these rotation systems are an efficient, eco-friendly approach to control soil borne pathogenic diseases and increase floral yields.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Outcome
control soil borne pathogenic diseases and increase floral yieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“We believe that applying these rotation systems is an efficient and eco-friendly approach to control soil borne pathogenic diseases and increase floral yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1553 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.