Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Hemp Yields and Its Rotation Effects on Wheat under Rainfed Mediterranean Conditions

Gil Gorchs; Jaume Lloveras; Lydia Serrano; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Core Ideas Rainfed Mediterranean environments might be suitable for double‐purpose hemp production. Hemp is a good predecessor for wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. The beneficial effects of hemp on the subsequent wheat yield appear to last for 2 yr. Monocropping hemp over 2 yr, does not reduce its grain and biomass yields. Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) has a low impact on the environment requiring few added resources, and has multiple downstream applications. There is little information on hemp biomass, seed yields, and response to NPK fertilization under humid rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Moreover, the effects of hemp on subsequent wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) crops have not been determined. To address these issues, we performed a field study for 6 yr in Catalonia (northeastern Spain). Hemp treatments included: hemp monoculture, unfertilized hemp succeeding wheat, and NPK‐fertilized hemp succeeding wheat. In turn, wheat treatments included: wheat monoculture, first‐, second‐, and third‐year wheat succeeding unfertilized hemp, and first‐, second‐, and third‐year wheat succeeding NPK‐fertilized hemp. The hemp biomass yields (5340–10,090 kg ha −1 ) were similar to or lower than those achieved in other European regions whereas the hemp seed yields were relatively high (604–1434 kg ha −1 ). Both the biomass yield and seed yield greatly increased with NPK fertilization. The rotation effects of hemp on the subsequent wheat crops increased the wheat yield by 1368 and 155 kg ha −1 in the first and second years, respectively, but in the third year the yield was similar to the wheat monoculture. The beneficial effects of hemp on wheat therefore appear to last for 2 yr. We conclude that dual‐purpose hemp (harvested for fiber and seed) is an excellent predecessor for wheat, improving the sustainability of cereal‐based cropping systems under humid rainfed Mediterranean conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp biomass yields of 5340–10,090 kg ha −1 were similar to or lower than yields elsewhere in Europe.

Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
similar to or lowere0
Value
5340–10,090 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hemp biomass yields (5340–10,090 kg ha −1 ) were similar to or lower than those achieved in other European regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp seed yields of 604–1434 kg ha −1 were relatively high.

Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
relatively highe0
Value
604–1434 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hemp seed yields were relatively high (604–1434 kg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased hemp biomass yield.

Treatment
NPK fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the biomass yield and seed yield greatly increased with NPK fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased hemp seed yield.

Treatment
NPK fertilizatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the biomass yield and seed yield greatly increased with NPK fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp rotation increased first year wheat yield by 1368 kg ha −1.

Treatment
hempe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1368e0
Comparator
wheat monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rotation effects of hemp on the subsequent wheat crops increased the wheat yield by 1368 and 155 kg ha −1 in the first and second years, respectively, but in the third year the yield was similar to the wheat monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp rotation increased second year wheat yield by 155 kg ha −1.

Treatment
hempe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
155 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
wheat monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rotation effects of hemp on the subsequent wheat crops increased the wheat yield by 1368 and 155 kg ha −1 in the first and second years, respectively, but in the third year the yield was similar to the wheat monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third year wheat yield after hemp was similar to monoculture.

Treatment
Hempt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
wheat monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the third year the yield was similar to the wheat monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp Yields and Its Rotation Effects on Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of hemp monocropping did not reduce its grain or biomass yields.

Treatment
Monocropping hemp over 2 yre0
Outcome
grain and biomass yieldse0
Direction
does not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocropping hemp over 2 yr, does not reduce its grain and biomass yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–337 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude dual purpose hemp is an excellent wheat predecessor.

Outcome
excellent predecessor for wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual‐purpose hemp (harvested for fiber and seed) is an excellent predecessor for wheat, improving the sustainability of cereal‐based cropping systems under humid rainfed Mediterranean conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1916 · show in text ↑

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rotation · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

31 papers: 25 positive, 6 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.