Paper · 2021 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Effect of Axillary Bud Suppression on Yield Attributes of Tomato

Tabi Kingsley Mbi; Shuimuh Ezekiel Njodzeka; Tatah Eugene Lendzemo; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effect of manual and chemical methods of axillary bud pruning on yield of tomato. Manual method of axillary bud pruning was mainly by nipping at different time intervals while chemical method involved treatment with Indole acetic acid (IAA) at different interval of application. The experiment was carried out in the experimental field of the Regional College of agriculture Bambili, North West Region of Cameroon. The experimental layout was a complete block design with the 3 main blocks being manual pruning by nipping, chemical pruning by IAA, and the control (zero pruning) repeated thrice. Results obtained revealed that both methods of axillary bud pruning improved fruit yield. Chemical method of axillary bud suppression through exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days interval gave significantly higher fruit diameter, fruit weight and number of marketable fruits compared to the time consuming and laborious nipping method and the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual axillary bud pruning improved tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
axillary bud pruninge0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control (zero pruning)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both methods of axillary bud pruning improved fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (zero pruning)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical axillary bud pruning improved tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
chemical pruning by IAAe1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control (zero pruning)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both methods of axillary bud pruning improved fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical pruning by IAA, and the control (zero pruning)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100μM IAA every 7 days significantly increased fruit diameter relative to nipping and control.

Treatment
exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days intervale0
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nipping method and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical method of axillary bud suppression through exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days interval gave significantly higher fruit diameter, fruit weight and number of marketable fruits compared to the time consuming and laborious nipping method and the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100μM IAA every 7 days significantly increased fruit weight relative to nipping and control.

Treatment
exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days intervale0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nipping method and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical method of axillary bud suppression through exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days interval gave significantly higher fruit diameter, fruit weight and number of marketable fruits compared to the time consuming and laborious nipping method and the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100μM IAA every 7 days significantly increased the number of marketable fruits relative to nipping and control.

Treatment
exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days intervale0
Outcome
number of marketable fruitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nipping method and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical method of axillary bud suppression through exogenous application of 100μM IAA at 7 days interval gave significantly higher fruit diameter, fruit weight and number of marketable fruits compared to the time consuming and laborious nipping method and the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

72 papers: 53 positive, 19 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.