Abstract
Two field trials wereconducted inaadministration field atFaqous Distrect, Sharqia Governorate in the two summer seasons of 2018 and 2019. This work was aimed to investigate the effect of planting distances, phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on growth andproductivity of stevia crop. The treatments consists of two planting distances, 25cm and 50cm between hills; phosphorus fertilization, without and with 15.5kg P2O5/faddan as well as four nitrogen fertilization treatments (15and30kg N /fad. each with and without foliar nutrient application).The results indicate that plant height and number of branches/plant did not significantly differed due to planting distances and phosphorus fertilization. Number of branches/ plant was significantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels up to 30kg/fad. compared with 15kg N/fad.Significant increments were observed by 50cmplanting distance and adding 100 kg super phosphtate at the2ndand 3third cut only by number of leaves/plant in the first season. The results showed significant increments due to planting stevia on 50cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphate by plant fresh weight, leaves fresh and dry weights/plant in the two season and all cuts excpect the first one by leavesfresh weight in the first season. On the other hand, total fresh yield/fad.leaves fresh and dry yields/fad. were significantly higher by planting stevia at 25cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphate/fad.Concerning the effect of adding 30 kg N/fad. and foliar application, there were significant increments in all studied characters of stevia by all cuts in the two seasons except plant height, which the differences did not reach the level of significance.Positive significant interaction effects were detected only by the interaction between planting distance and phosphorus fertilization on plant fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad.Leavesfresh and dry yields/fad, also between planting distance and adding 30kg/fad.nitrogen fertilization onleaves fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad. and leaves fresh and dry yields/fad.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing and phosphorus did not significantly alter height or branch count.
- Treatment
- planting distances and phosphorus fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- plant height and number of branches/plante0
- Direction
- did not significantly differede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plant height and number of branches/plant did not significantly differed due to planting distances and phosphorus fertilization.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising nitrogen to 30 kg/fad increased branches per plant relative to 15 kg N/fad.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Number of branches/ plant was significantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels up to 30kg/fad. compared with 15kg N/fad.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
At the second and third cuts, 50 cm spacing and superphosphate increased leaves per plant in the first season.
- Treatment
- 50cmplanting distance and adding 100 kg super phosphtatee0
- Outcome
- number of leaves/plante0
- Direction
- incrementse0
- Qualifier
- at the2ndand 3third cut onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant increments were observed by 50cmplanting distance and adding 100 kg super phosphtate at the2ndand 3third cut only by number of leaves/plant in the first season.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
50 cm spacing plus superphosphate increased fresh plant weight and fresh and dry leaf weight per plant.
- Treatment
- 50cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphatee0
- Outcome
- plant fresh weight, leaves fresh and dry weights/plante0
- Direction
- incrementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significant increments due to planting stevia on 50cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphate by plant fresh weight, leaves fresh and dry weights/plant in the two season and all cuts excpect the first one by leavesfresh weight in the first season.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
25 cm spacing plus superphosphate raised total fresh yield and fresh and dry leaf yield per area.
- Treatment
- 25cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphate/fad.e0
- Outcome
- total fresh yield/fad.leaves fresh and dry yields/fad.e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“total fresh yield/fad.leaves fresh and dry yields/fad. were significantly higher by planting stevia at 25cm distance and adding 100kg superphosphate/fad.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
30 kg N/fad with foliar application increased all studied traits except height.
- Treatment
- 30 kg N/fad. and foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- all studied characters of steviae0
- Direction
- incrementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“adding 30 kg N/fad. and foliar application, there were significant increments in all studied characters of stevia by all cuts in the two seasons except plant height”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Height differences under nitrogen and foliar application were nonsignificant.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“except plant height, which the differences did not reach the level of significance.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing and phosphorus interacted significantly for plant fresh weight and yields.
- Treatment
- planting distance and phosphorus fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- plant fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad.Leavesfresh and dry yields/fade0
- Direction
- Positivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Positive significant interaction effects were detected only by the interaction between planting distance and phosphorus fertilization on plant fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad.Leavesfresh and dry yields/fad”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing and 30 kg/fad nitrogen interacted significantly for leaf fresh weight and yields.
- Treatment
- planting distance and adding 30kg/fad.nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- leaves fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad. and leaves fresh and dry yields/fad.e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“between planting distance and adding 30kg/fad.nitrogen fertilization onleaves fresh weight, total fresh yield/fad. and leaves fresh and dry yields/fad.”
t0“STEVIA CROP”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · SteviaPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →phosphorus · growth · SteviaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
phosphorus · yield · SteviaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.