Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Production

REACTION OF SOME PEPPER CULTIVARS TO Leveillula taurica (Lev.) ARN. AND ITS CHEMICAL CONTROL

A. El-Kafrawy,; A. El-Maghrabi; A. Ismail

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

All tested pepper cultivar differed in their response to powdery mildew infection. Gedion Cv. was very susceptible (76.92 %), while Atol Cv. was the least susceptible one (12.55 %). A positive correlation between cultivars susceptibility and the number of stomata on both leaf surface was noticed. Atol Cv. was the least susceptible, whereas the number of stomata on the upper surface (25.3) and the lower surface (149.4)/cm2. Gedion Cv. was the highly susceptible, it was containing on the uppersurface (184.0) and the lower surface (390.7)/cm2. Score at 800 ppm and Emininte at 1000 ppm were inhibited the conidial germination and germ tube elongation, whereas the fungicides were highly toxic, while Topsin M was the least effective one. Score followed by Emininte were most effective fungicides in controlling the disease severity of pepper powdery mildew from 49.4 to 8.1 and 5.8 % respectively. While Topsin M was less effective one (38.0 %), as improved the plant hight, fresh and dry weight and increased the yield from 35.6 to 62.3 and 66.6 kg respectively in comparison to Topsin M (41.7 kg).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper cultivars differed in powdery mildew response.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Outcome
response to powdery mildew infectione0

Verbatim

e0

“All tested pepper cultivar differed in their response to powdery mildew infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gedion Cv. was very susceptible at 76.92 %.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Gedion Cv.e0
Outcome
very susceptiblee0
Value
76.92 %e0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“Gedion Cv. was very susceptible (76.92 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–124 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atol Cv. was least susceptible at 12.55 %.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Atol Cv.e0
Outcome
least susceptiblee0
Value
12.55 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“Atol Cv. was the least susceptible one (12.55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–180 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar susceptibility correlated positively with stomatal number.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Organ / stage
leaf surfacee0
Outcome
cultivars susceptibilitye0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation between cultivars susceptibility and the number of stomata on both leaf surface was noticed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atol Cv. had 25.3 stomata on the upper surface.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Atol Cv.e0
Outcome
number of stomata on the upper surfacee0
Value
25.3e0

Verbatim

e0

“Atol Cv. was the least susceptible, whereas the number of stomata on the upper surface (25.3) and the lower surface (149.4)/cm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atol Cv. had 149.4 stomata/cm2 on the lower surface.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Atol Cv.e0
Outcome
lower surfacee0
Value
149.4e0

Verbatim

e0

“Atol Cv. was the least susceptible, whereas the number of stomata on the upper surface (25.3) and the lower surface (149.4)/cm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gedion Cv. had 184.0 stomata/cm2 on the upper surface.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Gedion Cv.e0
Outcome
uppersurfacee0
Value
184.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“Gedion Cv. was the highly susceptible, it was containing on the uppersurface (184.0) and the lower surface (390.7)/cm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gedion Cv. had 390.7 stomata/cm2 on the lower surface.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Material
Gedion Cv.e0
Outcome
lower surfacee0
Value
390.7e0

Verbatim

e0

“Gedion Cv. was the highly susceptible, it was containing on the uppersurface (184.0) and the lower surface (390.7)/cm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Score at 800 ppm inhibited conidial germination and germ tube elongation.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Score at 800 ppme0
Outcome
conidial germination and germ tube elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Score at 800 ppm and Emininte at 1000 ppm were inhibited the conidial germination and germ tube elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emininte at 1000 ppm inhibited conidial germination and germ tube elongation.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Emininte at 1000 ppme0
Outcome
conidial germination and germ tube elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Score at 800 ppm and Emininte at 1000 ppm were inhibited the conidial germination and germ tube elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin M was the least effective fungicide.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Topsin Me0
Outcome
least effective onee0

Verbatim

e0

“Topsin M was the least effective one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Score reduced disease severity from 49.4 to 8.1 %.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
Scoree0
Outcome
disease severity of pepper powdery mildewe0
Direction
controllinge0
Value
8.1e0
Qualifier
49.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Score followed by Emininte were most effective fungicides in controlling the disease severity of pepper powdery mildew from 49.4 to 8.1 and 5.8 % respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emininte reduced disease severity from 49.4 to 5.8 %.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
Eminintee0
Outcome
disease severity of pepper powdery mildewe0
Direction
controllinge0
Value
5.8 %e0
Qualifier
49.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Score followed by Emininte were most effective fungicides in controlling the disease severity of pepper powdery mildew from 49.4 to 8.1 and 5.8 % respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin M was less effective, with 38.0 % disease severity.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Topsin Me0
Outcome
less effective onee0
Value
38.0 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“While Topsin M was less effective one (38.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective fungicides improved plant height and fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Outcome
plant hight, fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
Topsin Me0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“as improved the plant hight, fresh and dry weight and increased the yield from 35.6 to 62.3 and 66.6 kg respectively in comparison to Topsin M (41.7 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Score increased yield to 62.3 kg versus Topsin M at 41.7 kg.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Scoree1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
62.3e0
Qualifier
41.7 kge0
Comparator
Topsin Me0

Verbatim

e0

“as improved the plant hight, fresh and dry weight and increased the yield from 35.6 to 62.3 and 66.6 kg respectively in comparison to Topsin M (41.7 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Score followed by Emininte were most effective fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emininte increased yield to 66.6 kg versus Topsin M at 41.7 kg.

Taxon
PEPPER CULTIVARSt0
Treatment
Eminintee1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
66.6 kge0
Qualifier
41.7 kge0
Comparator
Topsin Me0

Verbatim

e0

“as improved the plant hight, fresh and dry weight and increased the yield from 35.6 to 62.3 and 66.6 kg respectively in comparison to Topsin M (41.7 kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Score followed by Emininte were most effective fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEPPER CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑