Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Production

GROWTH ASPECTS, YIELD AND RUSTS INFECTION FOR SOM WHEAT CULTIVARS (Triticum aestivum L.) AS AFFECTED BY SOWING DATES

S. El-Tabbakh,; Matilda Atteia

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-year field experiment (1997 and 1998) was carried out to study rusts infection and growth aspects for wheat cultivars (Giza 157 and 161, Gemmiza 1 and Sakha 8 and 69) as affected by sowing dates (5 and 20 November in addition to 5 December). Sowing date resulted in significant effects for all studied characters, except for leaf rust, in 1997, spike length and number of grains / spike over the two seasons. Rusts infection had the lowest records with the earlier sowing date (5/11) in both seasons. The intermediate date of sowing (20/11) exhibited the highest grain yield/ha., number of spikes m-2 and 100-kernel weight (averaged out 0.14 and 0.44g compared to early and late sowing, respectively). Differences among cultivars were significant for all studied characters, except for 100-kernel weight. Giza 161 cv. highly responded to rusts (29.52 and 51.82% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively) and produced the lowest grain yield/ha (4.47 t). Gemmiza 1 was exposed to lesser leaf and moderate stem rusts infection (5.1 and 19.2% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively as averages of both seasons) and gave the maximum records for spike length and number of grains/spike. Sakha 8 suprassed all cultivars in grain yield/ha. (7.29 t) and number of spikes m-2 (408.74) as averages of both seasons. Sowing date x cultivar interaction was significant for leaf rust (in 1998) and stem rust in addition to grain yield/ha. over the two seasons. Giza 161 was highly reacted to leaf (58.33%) and stem (64.54%) rusts for early sowing dates, respectively. On the other hand, Sakha 8 produced the highest grain yield (7.93 t/ha.) with the intermediate (20/11) sowing date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date significantly affected most studied wheat characters.

Treatment
Sowing datee0
Outcome
all studied characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing date resulted in significant effects for all studied characters, except for leaf rust, in 1997, spike length and number of grains / spike over the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing yielded the lowest rust infection in both seasons.

Treatment
earlier sowing date (5/11)e0
Outcome
Rusts infectione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rusts infection had the lowest records with the earlier sowing date (5/11) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate sowing produced the highest grain yield per hectare.

Treatment
intermediate date of sowing (20/11)e0
Outcome
grain yield/ha.e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intermediate date of sowing (20/11) exhibited the highest grain yield/ha., number of spikes m-2 and 100-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate sowing produced the highest spike density.

Treatment
intermediate date of sowing (20/11)e0
Outcome
number of spikes m-2e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intermediate date of sowing (20/11) exhibited the highest grain yield/ha., number of spikes m-2 and 100-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate sowing produced the highest kernel weight.

Treatment
intermediate date of sowing (20/11)e0
Outcome
100-kernel weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.14 and 0.44ge0
Comparator
early and late sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intermediate date of sowing (20/11) exhibited the highest grain yield/ha., number of spikes m-2 and 100-kernel weight (averaged out 0.14 and 0.44g compared to early and late sowing, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly for all studied characters except kernel weight.

Outcome
all studied characterse0
Qualifier
except for 100-kernel weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences among cultivars were significant for all studied characters, except for 100-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 161 had 29.52% leaf rust.

Material
Giza 161e0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
leafe0
Value
29.52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 161 cv. highly responded to rusts (29.52 and 51.82% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively) and produced the lowest grain yield/ha (4.47 t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 161 had 51.82% stem rust.

Material
Giza 161e0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
stem rustse0
Value
51.82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 161 cv. highly responded to rusts (29.52 and 51.82% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively) and produced the lowest grain yield/ha (4.47 t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 161 had the lowest grain yield at 4.47 t.

Material
Giza 161e0
Outcome
grain yield/hae0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.47 te0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 161 cv. highly responded to rusts (29.52 and 51.82% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively) and produced the lowest grain yield/ha (4.47 t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 1 had 5.1% leaf rust.

Material
Gemmiza 1e0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
leafe0
Direction
lessere0
Value
5.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gemmiza 1 was exposed to lesser leaf and moderate stem rusts infection (5.1 and 19.2% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively as averages of both seasons)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 1 had 19.2% stem rust.

Material
Gemmiza 1e0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
stem rusts infectione0
Value
19.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gemmiza 1 was exposed to lesser leaf and moderate stem rusts infection (5.1 and 19.2% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively as averages of both seasons)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmiza 1 had maximal spike length and grain number per spike.

Material
Gemmiza 1e0
Outcome
spike length and number of grains/spikee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gemmiza 1 was exposed to lesser leaf and moderate stem rusts infection (5.1 and 19.2% for leaf and stem rusts, respectively as averages of both seasons) and gave the maximum records for spike length and number of grains/spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 8 had the highest grain yield at 7.29 t.

Material
Sakha 8e0
Outcome
grain yield/ha.e0
Direction
suprassede0
Value
7.29 te0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 8 suprassed all cultivars in grain yield/ha. (7.29 t) and number of spikes m-2 (408.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 8 had the highest spike density at 408.74.

Material
Sakha 8e0
Outcome
number of spikes m-2e0
Direction
suprassede0
Value
408.74e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 8 suprassed all cultivars in grain yield/ha. (7.29 t) and number of spikes m-2 (408.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sowing date by cultivar interaction significantly affected rust and yield.

Interactor
ruste0pathogen
Outcome
leaf rust (in 1998) and stem rust in addition to grain yield/ha.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing date x cultivar interaction was significant for leaf rust (in 1998) and stem rust in addition to grain yield/ha. over the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing Giza 161 had 58.33% leaf rust.

Material
Giza 161e0
Treatment
early sowing datese0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
leafe0
Value
58.33%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 161 was highly reacted to leaf (58.33%) and stem (64.54%) rusts for early sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing Giza 161 had 64.54% stem rust.

Material
Giza 161e0
Treatment
early sowing datese0
Interactor
rustsPuccinialese0pathogen
Outcome
steme0
Value
64.54%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 161 was highly reacted to leaf (58.33%) and stem (64.54%) rusts for early sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 8 yielded 7.93 t/ha with intermediate sowing.

Material
Sakha 8e0
Treatment
intermediate (20/11) sowing datee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.93 t/ha.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 8 produced the highest grain yield (7.93 t/ha.) with the intermediate (20/11) sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑

sowing time · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.