Abstract
Grain yield and quality are critical factors in agricultural production. This study aimed to investigate the impact of sowing time on wheat yield and quality and identify the optimal sowing period for wheat in the Xinjiang region of China. The yield and quality changes of different spring and winter wheat varieties were investigated under different sowing periods. The results showed that late sowing of winter wheat and winter sowing of spring wheat adversely affected wheat yield, especially in spring wheat. For winter wheat, late sowing resulted in higher protein content, wet gluten content, rheological properties, and tensile strength, indicating potential quality improvements with delayed sowing. In contrast, the four spring wheat varieties showed an increase in protein and wet gluten contents under winter sowing treatments. However, the effects of winter sowing on grain quality parameters varied among the four varieties. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing wheat sowing dates locally to achieve both high yield and quality in wheat production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing reduced winter wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- late sowinge0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“late sowing of winter wheat and winter sowing of spring wheat adversely affected wheat yield, especially in spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Winter sowing reduced spring wheat yield, especially strongly.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- winter sowinge0
- Outcome
- spring wheate0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“late sowing of winter wheat and winter sowing of spring wheat adversely affected wheat yield, especially in spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing increased winter wheat protein and wet gluten content and rheological properties.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- late sowinge0
- Outcome
- protein content, wet gluten content, rheological propertiese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For winter wheat, late sowing resulted in higher protein content, wet gluten content, rheological properties, and tensile strength”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing increased winter wheat tensile strength.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- late sowinge0
- Outcome
- tensile strengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For winter wheat, late sowing resulted in higher protein content, wet gluten content, rheological properties, and tensile strength”
Claim · model-written summary
Winter sowing increased protein and wet gluten contents in four spring wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- four spring wheat varietiese0
- Treatment
- winter sowing treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protein and wet gluten contentse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the four spring wheat varieties showed an increase in protein and wet gluten contents under winter sowing treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Winter sowing affected grain quality differently among the four spring wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- four varietiese0
- Treatment
- winter sowinge0
- Outcome
- grain quality parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the effects of winter sowing on grain quality parameters varied among the four varieties”
t0“Wheat Varieties”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 266 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
458 papers more in this group
See all 462 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.